S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Setup change to EFR

Old Mar 6, 2015 | 09:07 AM
  #1  
nissfam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Default Setup change to EFR

After some issues with my current setup I have decided to switch to a full race/EFR setup. I have a sleeved 9:1cr, 2.4L motor with ported head that currently makes 550whp on pump fuel. My power goals are the same as now for pump fuel... I will do a race gas calibration as well and will be looking at the 700-750whp range on that fuel.

The Borg EFR 9180 is my choice and was wondering how that turbo responds... Any input is wonderful
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2015 | 09:28 AM
  #2  
Jin_SK's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 750
Likes: 4
Default

BorgWarner has a matchbot application that will show you roughly how the car will work on the map. Based on a estimate it looks like it might be a little laggy up to about 5k. You will probably want the externally gated 1.45 A/R 9180.

matchbox
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2015 | 09:32 AM
  #3  
nissfam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Default

Thats one of the things I was wondering about... The 1.05 or the 1.45. Does anyone here have this setup?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2015 | 11:15 AM
  #4  
Jin_SK's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 750
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by nissfam
Thats one of the things I was wondering about... The 1.05 or the 1.45. Does anyone here have this setup?
There aren't a ton of people on the EFR, let alone the 9180. I have the IWG 7670 and I think someone did the 8374, not sure. There's a bunch of EVO/STI guys that have the 9180 and are making the power you're looking for and I'd be shocked if the S2000 couldn't do similarly.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2015 | 11:31 AM
  #5  
Alloy Craft's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 944
Likes: 3
Default

What turbo are you running now?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2015 | 02:37 PM
  #6  
AE85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Default

From what the guy said, the 8374 didnt fit. It was just physically too big. Im sure you can get around it with a cut off wheel
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2015 | 02:38 PM
  #7  
AE85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jin_SK
Originally Posted by nissfam' timestamp='1425666764' post='23529993
Thats one of the things I was wondering about... The 1.05 or the 1.45. Does anyone here have this setup?
There aren't a ton of people on the EFR, let alone the 9180. I have the IWG 7670 and I think someone did the 8374, not sure. There's a bunch of EVO/STI guys that have the 9180 and are making the power you're looking for and I'd be shocked if the S2000 couldn't do similarly.
What are the numbers with your 7670? Any issues holding boost?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2015 | 03:09 PM
  #8  
Jin_SK's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 750
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by AE85
Originally Posted by Jin_SK' timestamp='1425672917' post='23530141
[quote name='nissfam' timestamp='1425666764' post='23529993']
Thats one of the things I was wondering about... The 1.05 or the 1.45. Does anyone here have this setup?
There aren't a ton of people on the EFR, let alone the 9180. I have the IWG 7670 and I think someone did the 8374, not sure. There's a bunch of EVO/STI guys that have the 9180 and are making the power you're looking for and I'd be shocked if the S2000 couldn't do similarly.
What are the numbers with your 7670? Any issues holding boost?
[/quote]

495whp/402tq on E85 and 397whp/293tq on 91. Boost holds pretty pretty well other than the seemingly typical spike at ~4500.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2015 | 04:27 PM
  #9  
ZSAK's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,885
Likes: 66
From: Cary, NC
Default

I wonder what 7064 will do
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2015 | 06:04 PM
  #10  
Jin_SK's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 750
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by ZSAK
I wonder what 7064 will do
I'd only run that turbo that small on a stroked motor with a lower rev limit (~7000), otherwise you'd be way overspinning it. Even then the 7163 is would be a better choice.
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 PM.