SOS 3.4 vs 3.6 power
Can anyone running either of these pulleys give me a list of your mods, elevation, and what power your making?
Also which blower you are using.
I ordered a 3.6" pulley and belt, but now I'm thinking I should have just gone 3.4" and been done with it.
Also which blower you are using.
I ordered a 3.6" pulley and belt, but now I'm thinking I should have just gone 3.4" and been done with it.
Any input on this for power vs reliability.
I don't want to over stress the blower. But I'd like to optimize power the first time.
My mods:
Test pipe
Supporting fuel & clutch parts.
I'm at sea level. I was thinking 3.6" would put me around 400-415whp and 3.4" would be closer to 425-440whp
I don't want to over stress the blower. But I'd like to optimize power the first time.
My mods:
Test pipe
Supporting fuel & clutch parts.
I'm at sea level. I was thinking 3.6" would put me around 400-415whp and 3.4" would be closer to 425-440whp
Should I just say "screw it" and get the 3.2" pulley? I believe that is the smallest to go w/o overspinning on the F22.
Eh I probably stick with 3.4", hopefully SOS will let me return the 3.6" I just bought.
Trending Topics
I have the 1200 kit w/ the 3.6" pulley, Berk HFC, stock exhaust, SoS clutch and fuel mods.
I'm dyno'd 382whp/249tq at about 13psi on a dyno dynamics that allegedly reads conservatively. Butt dyno though it's much faster than with my 4.2" pulley.
I'm dyno'd 382whp/249tq at about 13psi on a dyno dynamics that allegedly reads conservatively. Butt dyno though it's much faster than with my 4.2" pulley.
I know altitude can decrease psi. I was hoping you'd be at 400+whp.
I may have to go with the 3.4 inch pulley.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
s2konroids
S2000 Forced Induction
7
Jan 1, 2015 03:26 PM








