S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

SUPERCHARGER OR NOT?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 01:22 PM
  #11  
Halo's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by REVHIR,Nov 13 2005, 11:49 PM
j/k keep it off.... ummm comptech is good but does not make power as easily as vortech i hear and tends to over heat.
This is information is coming from what source may I ask?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 02:36 PM
  #12  
Slows2k's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45,368
Likes: 428
From: Mother F'in TN
Default

It's from nowhere reliable.

Comptech and Vortech systems have been proven relaible, each with there own quirks/drawbacks. Vortech Vs Comptech has been debated since the dawn of both kits.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 03:38 PM
  #13  
YellowS2kPwr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,906
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by WindchaserS2K,Nov 14 2005, 01:42 PM
Cause it just won't happen
With a nice launch it should.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 03:42 PM
  #14  
jetguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: peachtree city
Default

nitorus is faster
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 05:49 PM
  #15  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

Originally Posted by YellowS2kPwr,Nov 16 2005, 10:38 AM
With a nice launch it should.
Perhaps, but it doesn't.

The people posting here are not newby office chair racers. Many of us have had SCs and taken them as far as they will go.

There are no known overheating problems with the Comptech and the performance differences between the two commonly available options are little enough to be insignificant.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 11:29 PM
  #16  
YellowS2kPwr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,906
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by AusS2000,Nov 15 2005, 06:49 PM
Perhaps, but it doesn't.

The people posting here are not newby office chair racers. Many of us have had SCs and taken them as far as they will go.

There are no known overheating problems with the Comptech and the performance differences between the two commonly available options are little enough to be insignificant.
And how far did they go?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 12:00 AM
  #17  
nsxinsac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Fair Oaks, CA
Default

I had the CTSC @ 9psi tuned with AEM EMS, header, exhaust, ACT clutch and CT flywheel and it did not feel like a 12 second car at all. IMO the SC S2000s are not ideal for the drag strip but once you are rolling at 6,000 rpms and floor it, that is when you will mostly notice the increased power over stock. But off the line (with out launching) or a 10 mph roll on, you will be waiting until you hit around 6K. Get the 456's and you will not have to wait quit as long to hit your power band.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 03:56 AM
  #18  
jakub2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 1
From: Slovakian living in Dubai
Default

Originally Posted by YellowS2kPwr,Nov 16 2005, 04:38 AM
With a nice launch it should.
In my book a launch is far from being nice on this car. I NEVER did it. Time to time I hit it from the light (once a month) and I still let the clutch slip a bit.
A fancy time slip will not buy me replacement parts in the drive train

I guess what really counts is how much faster the car "feels" to YOU during "spirited" driving, taking corners and exiting them, exits from round-abouts ect. not how many fractions of a second you can shave off your 1/4 time.

Believe me a stock final drive s2000 with a standart SC kit will strugle to beat a I/H/E with 4.57 final drive equiped car from 0-60.

Putting on my flame suit
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 08:10 AM
  #19  
Halo's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
Default

You're probably right. It's not until VTEC/boost in 3rd that I can 'feel' the difference the SC is making. 4th even more. It's only in the higher gears that the engine spends more than just a moment in boost.

6,000 to 9,000 rpm goes by so fast in 1st and 2nd, that I find it hard to 'feel' the SC effect, usually I'm concentrating on the tach to make sure I don't bounce off the limiter.

But, I think it's hard to answer the OP's ? "SC or not" objectively. Part of it depends on what you're trying to get out of the car, part of it on how much 5-6 grand hurts your pocketbook.

From a purely objective standpoint $/hp or $/sec ET or $/trap, you could do much better. For example, you could pick up a slightly used 600cc sportbike and learn to ride it well. At that point, arguing about whether you can do 4.5 vs 5.0 second 0-60s or trap 108 vs 100 would be laughable.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:03 PM
  #20  
bumpins2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: 818 Burbank 213 Ktown
Default

hmm that is weird... i ran a 12.3 and 12.4 on my comptech setup... i admit yes it doesn't feel like a 12 second car and everyone talks about how they cannot feel the boost or pull until they hit 6k rpm. obviously with my tuning my car feels like it pulls instantly starting at around 4000k since my vtec kicks in @ 3500rpm. i will post my time slips once i scan them. oh and although im using a 10lb pulley the ap2 apparently allows 8.5-9psi boost with the rev limiter set to 8300rpm
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:14 AM.