S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Supercharger Vtec engagements and piggybacks?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 10:59 AM
  #11  
ChefJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 3
From: Braselton, GA
Default

exactly the same
only difference is injectors couldn't run 1000cc's with an emanage and the map sensor
same tuner different dynos
same mani same turbo same exhaust same intercooler and piping.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 11:00 AM
  #12  
ChefJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 3
From: Braselton, GA
Default

original plot was on 10 pounds.
second plot was on 13-13.5
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 11:04 AM
  #13  
devs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,852
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

I was just trying to stick up for the lowly EU

supercharged s2k with vtec at 4k..

Reply
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 08:19 PM
  #14  
MuckaLun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: 604
Default

first off, thanks for all the input.

I guess the numbers don't tell the whole story but this dyno reads extremely low.

Examples:
Same AP1 with FIPK and 63mm testpipe = 164
Average AP1 dynos = 160
AP1 Greddy Turbo with 70mm single, TB = 212
Inlinepro 14psi meth & AEM = 320

The owner of the vehicle will be staying with Emanage Ultimate as we have Aircare here in Van, BC (basically California smog standards).

Hes happy with the tune and theres more to be had with more dyno tuning.

What we're wondering is if anyone is having the lean spike when lowering the transition?

Boost levels don't change much, it sees an extra .5 psi with the drop of 1000 rpm on VTEC transition, but the curve gains are huge. about 20rwhp/10 tq more from 4500 all the way up. the only problem with keeping it there is the 13.3 a/f spike during the transition.

anyone know if the the lean spot of 13.3 a/f during transition is safe for those 500rpm's @ about 3psi? i'm thinking its acceptable at such low boost levels/rpms...and was wondering what other members take on this is..

i'll see if i can get the member to chime in and post up his plots..
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 01:53 AM
  #15  
604S2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Default

^^ for the request on my plots
dyno/tuning all done on the same mustange dyno including the NA pull

03 AP1

NA
-K&N FIPK Intake
-T1R 63mm test pipe


9 Months later.......

Minor cleanup 2 days after the first intial tune
-CTSC Aftercooled
-SOS 3.6" Pulley
-750cc RC injectors
-Invidia 70mm Test pipe
-Greddy Ultimate w/boomslang harness
-AEM UEGO 30-4100


AFR's on same day of the cleanup
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 12:23 PM
  #16  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by MuckaLun,Mar 8 2009, 08:19 PM
first off, thanks for all the input.

I guess the numbers don't tell the whole story but this dyno reads extremely low.

Examples:
Same AP1 with FIPK and 63mm testpipe = 164
Average AP1 dynos = 160
AP1 Greddy Turbo with 70mm single, TB = 212
Inlinepro 14psi meth & AEM = 320

The owner of the vehicle will be staying with Emanage Ultimate as we have Aircare here in Van, BC (basically California smog standards).

Hes happy with the tune and theres more to be had with more dyno tuning.

What we're wondering is if anyone is having the lean spike when lowering the transition?

Boost levels don't change much, it sees an extra .5 psi with the drop of 1000 rpm on VTEC transition, but the curve gains are huge. about 20rwhp/10 tq more from 4500 all the way up. the only problem with keeping it there is the 13.3 a/f spike during the transition.

anyone know if the the lean spot of 13.3 a/f during transition is safe for those 500rpm's @ about 3psi? i'm thinking its acceptable at such low boost levels/rpms...and was wondering what other members take on this is..

i'll see if i can get the member to chime in and post up his plots..
At that boost level, 13.3 afr and for just a 500rpm spike at that rpm range I would even sweat it. No problem at all.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 12:40 PM
  #17  
S20004ME_PDX's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: PDX
Default

s2000Junky,

I noticed recently you've stepped up to 10.5 psi? What size/brand pulley are you running? And what management system are you running? Any partial throttle issues?

A while back (last summer), we've exchanged some PM's and I tried to VAFC fuel tuning trick you showed me, but it didn't work out as well for me as it did for you, so I zero'd out everything and went back to a straight up FMU tune at 7psi, and I started saving towards a Standalone system like everyone is suggesting. I'm getting close to getting all the parts needed, I'm just trying to decide if that new SOS heat exchanger is worth the 300 bucks since I'll be ordering their 3 bar MAP sensor and 10 psi pulley from them, I minus well do it together if its worth it.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 02:34 PM
  #18  
604S2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Default

[QUOTE=S20004ME_PDX,Mar 9 2009, 12:40 PM] s2000Junky,

I noticed recently you've stepped up to 10.5 psi?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #19  
S20004ME_PDX's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: PDX
Default

Originally Posted by 604S2000,Mar 9 2009, 03:34 PM
I had to order another 3.6" 10psi pulley from SOS today and apparantly they ran out. I ended up taking their last display model one they had. So you might want to contact them or even jump on the 3.4"!
!!!

Yikes! Thanks for the heads up!
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 09:22 AM
  #20  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

[QUOTE=S20004ME_PDX,Mar 9 2009, 12:40 PM] s2000Junky,

I noticed recently you've stepped up to 10.5 psi?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:18 AM.