S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 06:15 PM
  #11  
wazzurp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OHio
Default

Well I am going to get that turbo, I just cant pass up a deal like I am getting, I have read a couple of articles coupled with some F1 racing info and it seems that used a similar idea as to the one I am using. Larger turbine house with small exhuast A/R. I guess we will see what it brings. I will not have this done before winter so prepare to wait for awhile.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 07:10 PM
  #12  
Soul Coughing's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 71
From: Chiswick
Default

Originally Posted by wazzurp,Nov 8 2007, 10:15 PM
Well I am going to get that turbo, I just cant pass up a deal like I am getting, I have read a couple of articles coupled with some F1 racing info and it seems that used a similar idea as to the one I am using. Larger turbine house with small exhuast A/R. I guess we will see what it brings. I will not have this done before winter so prepare to wait for awhile.
good luck! how much are you getting the turbo for, if you mind me asking!?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 10:15 AM
  #13  
wazzurp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OHio
Default

$300 Brand new with a 3 inch downpipe and vband
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 10:21 AM
  #14  
Soul Coughing's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 71
From: Chiswick
Default

Originally Posted by wazzurp,Nov 9 2007, 02:15 PM
$300 Brand new with a 3 inch downpipe and vband
what downpipe are they giving? for that price you could get a larger exhaust housing and throw that thing on too!
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 12:42 PM
  #15  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by AirborneS2K,Nov 8 2007, 10:53 PM
I gave that advice b/c Inline Pro first started me out w/ a .63 a/r turbine and I made ~310whp @ 18 psi...straight shitty son, I could only imagine that a .48 would net you the same power. I have a .83 a/r now and just made over 450whp on 93 octane and 18 psi (check my thread). So that turbo would be a waste in my opinion, you'd be better off going supercharged.
I can't imagine that it was just the A/R that caused those numbers.

I'm running a 0.48 A/R and I hit 400...
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 12:56 PM
  #16  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,505
Likes: 49
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

Originally Posted by AndyFloyd,Nov 8 2007, 08:51 PM
it would spool fairly fast but would drop off after 7k since the .48 is just too restrictive. At least go with a .63 turbine.
Exactly and it's been tested and concluded that even a .63 A/R turbine is pooping out at the top but is better for more midrange on this engine. The best A/R on this car because of it's high rpm is the .82 but it all comes down to what you want the maximum gains to be at; midrange or top end.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 01:45 PM
  #17  
afwfjustin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,423
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by AirborneS2K,Nov 8 2007, 09:53 PM
I gave that advice b/c Inline Pro first started me out w/ a .63 a/r turbine and I made ~310whp @ 18 psi...straight shitty son, I could only imagine that a .48 would net you the same power. I have a .83 a/r now and just made over 450whp on 93 octane and 18 psi (check my thread). So that turbo would be a waste in my opinion, you'd be better off going supercharged.
That all has to do with your manifold though. I have a .63ar hotside and I make 400 at 11 psi. If I was running 18 like you, I'd be well over 500 even with the smaller hotside.

To the OP, that is a great deal, you should go with a tubular manifold setup and I'm sure your car will be kick ass.

The cool part about having a midrange car is that you don't HAVE to redline to get the power out of the car. I don't even get traction until 3rd gear and I usually shift at 5500 rpms in 1st and 2nd. Having a huge midrange is like giving the car a V8. If you only want a 300rwhp setup, you shouldn't shoot for 300 peak, shoot for 400 and then you can have your 300 at 5k rpms or something and you don't have to wind the car out to redline all the time just to make power.

Don't mind these small hotside/turbo haters, they're just mad that they only make more power than us after 8k
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 04:35 PM
  #18  
wazzurp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OHio
Default

I believe the downpipe is a custom job. I can get a custom tubular manifold made from stainless from a company here in cincy for pretty cheap. I am not looking to get huge number I just want a mild setup and right now it looks like I will be able to do this using very quality parts, using a v-setup like the guy on here, and an EMS or some other management system for under $4000 due to some of the friends I have here. This includes everything that I would need including tuning and a clutch. I know that there are a lot of hidden costs but I think this should be an Okay setup. Soul Coughing, yeah I was thinking of changing the exhaust side too for the money that I am getting this for.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #19  
flitcrma's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

The downpipe was a custom job. Unless you've got a T3 exhaust casting running my old tubular manifold for a Saturn, it won't do anything besides give you a free 3" V band clamp and a new piece of 3" flexpipe. If it's worth it to try to save, there's an O2 bung that you might be able to pop out of there as well.

I'm trying to make space, so the more stuff I can get rid of, the better.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 02:14 PM
  #20  
wazzurp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OHio
Default

To continue on, I am looking at a manifold like this for my application and I have recently been searching and accumulating information about turbos. I read that if you run high boost, you actually want to have a smaller wastegate to hold boost and vice versa. I am just looking for some direction on where to go. See link below for the manifold that I think I am going to get made by a local fabricator here in Cincinnati (good work).

http://www.kms-fab.com/tubemani.html
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boostalmighty
S2000 Forced Induction
11
Mar 2, 2010 04:15 PM
JayStyles662
S2000 Forced Induction
0
Apr 30, 2007 12:41 PM
Tyraid2K
Want to Buy
0
Mar 23, 2007 07:03 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:27 AM.