S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Twin charged (Turbo + Supercharger)

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 24, 2014 | 08:54 PM
  #91  
kryptonite's Avatar
Member
Spotter
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,215
Likes: 278
From: Somerville, MA
Default

Originally Posted by JUSTINTHECOASTIE
300lbs of tq @ 2.4k? awesome!
It's in Nm. So approximately 220 ft lbs
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2014 | 06:10 PM
  #92  
JUSTINTHECOASTIE's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,805
Likes: 15
From: St.Petersburg/Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by kryptonite
Originally Posted by JUSTINTHECOASTIE' timestamp='1403656910' post='23216894
300lbs of tq @ 2.4k? awesome!
It's in Nm. So approximately 220 ft lbs
still not too shabby
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2014 | 09:39 AM
  #93  
cuci591's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Default

Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 09:26 AM
  #94  
DaGou's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 3
From: Myrtle Beach
Default

I think what you going is great, fantasic, cutting edge, pushing what we have to new limits. But it is nothing that I would want to spend the money doing. I think a properly sized and tuned turbo almost gets you there. Yes you will have a little more low end torque but the S revs so quickly I do not know if it would make a difference. Add to that the complexity of the system and the tune, there are just to many things to keep running. Keep up the good work, appreciate you posts and updates.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 11:28 AM
  #95  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by DaGou
I think what you going is great, fantasic, cutting edge, pushing what we have to new limits. But it is nothing that I would want to spend the money doing. I think a properly sized and tuned turbo almost gets you there. Yes you will have a little more low end torque but the S revs so quickly I do not know if it would make a difference. Add to that the complexity of the system and the tune, there are just to many things to keep running. Keep up the good work, appreciate you posts and updates.
I agree, I mean if you really wanted to best duplicate this power and curve, you would just do the v8 conversion. All the power and simplicity/reliability of a N/A motor. BUT this is way more interesting and fun, and I am glad someone has the financial resources to implement and see it through to fruition. Love it ...and Love isnt always a matter of practicality
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 11:32 AM
  #96  
CoolGuy094's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
Originally Posted by DaGou' timestamp='1404235591' post='23225726
I think what you going is great, fantasic, cutting edge, pushing what we have to new limits. But it is nothing that I would want to spend the money doing. I think a properly sized and tuned turbo almost gets you there. Yes you will have a little more low end torque but the S revs so quickly I do not know if it would make a difference. Add to that the complexity of the system and the tune, there are just to many things to keep running. Keep up the good work, appreciate you posts and updates.
I agree, I mean if you really wanted to best duplicate this power and curve, you would just do the v8 conversion. All the power and simplicity/reliability of a N/A motor. BUT this is way more interesting and fun, and I am glad someone has the financial resources to implement and see it through to fruition. Love it ...and Love isnt always a matter of practicality
LOL, exactly! Sometimes love is crazy and doesn't make sense. I too am glad to see people like you guys thinking outside the box and doing something crazy for the love of it.

Why do it? Because its f**king awesome, that's why.

Enjoyed reading through this thread and look forward to more updates.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2014 | 01:21 AM
  #97  
Kitesurfer s2000's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,341
Likes: 5
From: lymington
Default

How are you handling all the heat under there this is amazing by the way
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2014 | 02:34 PM
  #98  
YuriArts's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 666
Likes: 2
From: Holland
Default

Originally Posted by Kitesurfer s2000
How are you handling all the heat under there this is amazing by the way
Funny you would say that: Overheating thread


I tested the car on track. The Turbo/Supercharger is definitely working but the engine is overheating. I won't repost everything, it's in that thread.
Any help on the issue is appreciated!
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2014 | 01:14 PM
  #99  
YuriArts's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 666
Likes: 2
From: Holland
Default

We completely changed the setup. Air from supercharger is going to the turbo first, being intercooled, then to the intake manifold.

First serious dyno at 1.35bar. Back to back 91octane against e85.

Reply
Old Sep 16, 2014 | 04:51 PM
  #100  
kryptonite's Avatar
Member
Spotter
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,215
Likes: 278
From: Somerville, MA
Default

That torque curve is madness. Would like to see how you're plumbing this out
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:25 PM.