S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Update numbers for 59/65b inline kit

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 26, 2009 | 08:38 AM
  #11  
dsddcd's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 7
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by ScorpionT,Jun 26 2009, 08:20 AM
Someone should try out the billet 5857!
I thought it was a 58/65
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2009 | 08:59 AM
  #12  
ScorpionT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Default

The 65 refers to the turbine side, which is a 65mm exducer. You can get it with the 57, 62, and 65mm sizes. Even running high RPM you shouldnt need the 65mm unless you are running like 3.0L+
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2009 | 09:19 AM
  #13  
Revenge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Annapolis MD
Default

Nice numbers, the 5857 is going to be to small for this car, I can't tell you why but it seem to like the larger exducer for higher power gains. Maybe a 5862.

I am assuming this is a single correct Greddy Tic?
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2009 | 09:21 AM
  #14  
ZSAK's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,885
Likes: 66
From: Cary, NC
Default

ya it is the 70mm single, btw the exhaust sounds mean when pushed
I will post dyno once I get it from the tuner
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2009 | 12:01 PM
  #15  
ScorpionT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Revenge,Jun 26 2009, 11:19 AM
Nice numbers, the 5857 is going to be to small for this car, I can't tell you why but it seem to like the larger exducer for higher power gains. Maybe a 5862.

I am assuming this is a single correct Greddy Tic?
It wont be too small, trust me. The larger turbines are best used with extreme boost applications or for larger displacement motors. For sub 500whp and 2.5L displacements, the 5857 would do just fine. Honda motors are efficient and dont need serious airflow to make big power.

I think someone needs to try the 5857 and 5862 on their car. Anyone willing to test these out?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 01:10 PM
  #16  
TRBOKEV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
From: Phillips Ranch 909!
Default

Bump for dyno graph!
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 07:52 PM
  #17  
ZSAK's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,885
Likes: 66
From: Cary, NC
Default

Sorry guys I still have not received the dynograph actually I completely forgot about it due to work. I will try to get a hold of him on monday and see if he can send it to me.

On a side note the car feels great and exhaust sounds great.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 10:24 PM
  #18  
TRBOKEV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
From: Phillips Ranch 909!
Default

Thanks, i cant wait to see the graph finally.

I have the same exhaust as you right now, but was going to change it to a 3 inch single.. I wonder how much a difference it would be between 70 single and 80 single. I also like the greddy 70 single as much as you.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 05:13 PM
  #19  
Revenge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Annapolis MD
Default

I am not sure a 3" is going to make a huge differnce for the money I would prob just keep tour Greddy 70mm. It is a very nice exhuast from the posts that I read.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 10:05 PM
  #20  
TRBOKEV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
From: Phillips Ranch 909!
Default

Bump for the dyno graph.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:27 AM.