S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

At what point do you need a FMIC?

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 12:40 AM
  #1  
Itchy Dick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 1
From: Newcastle-Upon-Tyne
Default At what point do you need a FMIC?

I'm looking for a 2nd hand Comptech SC.

There's one for sale without the AC as he's using a frount mount intercooler.

At what stage of tune is a FMIC better than a standard CT after cooler? Would it be overkill on a standard setup?

Thanks,

Nick.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 02:23 AM
  #2  
stena's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 10
From: Skopje
Default

I guess is better to have a FMIC than not to have one...What type of FMIc?
Depending on the type it could loose some more or less psi
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 07:40 AM
  #3  
Itchy Dick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 1
From: Newcastle-Upon-Tyne
Default

Wasn't too sure on make TBH.

Is there any 'off the shelf' kits rather than custom?
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 07:45 AM
  #4  
afwfjustin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,423
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Default

You will lose a lot of boost with the front mount - if you're not running high boost (10+) it's probably a better idea to not use it and just run the charger straight into the throttle body.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 09:03 AM
  #5  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

just use the aftercooler, much more efficent and does the same thing.

Intercooler on a SC is just for looks.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #6  
goldenfri's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 16,673
Likes: 729
From: Maryland
Default

^^

A front mount radiator is for looks, but a front mount intercooler will lower intake temps, but may loose some boost.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 10:16 AM
  #7  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Then please explain why all the high powered SC s2ks do not have FMICs....

Its not as efficent as an aftercooler.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 17, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #8  
dalink's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, Va
Default

Preference? I do agree, I like the aftercooler more though.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #9  
goldenfri's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 16,673
Likes: 729
From: Maryland
Default

You said it does nothing... that is not true. I didn't say which was more efficent, but the UR intercooler has been show to have lower intake temps than an aftercooler.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 11:03 AM
  #10  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by goldenfri,Feb 17 2008, 02:30 PM
You said it does nothing... that is not true. I didn't say which was more efficent, but the UR intercooler has been show to have lower intake temps than an aftercooler.
Well of course it does SOMETHING, a 3k ASM intake does something. Thats not the point I'm getting at.

All things considered (price, efficency, power), the aftercooler is still the winner.

The FMIC might lower intake temps more but at the expense of that horrible U-joint and a lower boost pressure. In other words, your still making less power then an AC setup despite having lower intake temps.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:23 AM.