The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

Finished my build finally :)

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 05:47 AM
  #1  
barhonda_s2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: In the Mountains of PA
Default Finished my build finally :)

http://youtu.be/phvv94LVJN8

please watch my video and rate thanks

soon going to 3" exhaust and a little head work. want 450! but for now it is a really reliable safe tune and im happy with that.

AP1 2000 apex blue pearl
precision 6262s .82 turbo
pfab log manifold - in the future will go with pfab elt manifold
3" downpipe and mid section
2.5 exhaust
255 walbro fuel pump
1000cc id injectors
omni map sensor
obx/ebay intercooler
custom 2.5" intercooler piping
aem digital gauges
hondata kpro
cometic 3mm headgasket
arp head studs
probably alot more but i forget right now

made 403hp and 280trq on 16psi
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 05:56 AM
  #2  
ian02s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 362
Likes: 1
From: Woodbury, MN
Default

Very nice set up man. I like the ride Put your stock HG back on and re-tune. You may get closer to that 450 mark
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 06:15 AM
  #3  
DFWs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 2
From: Denton, TX
Default

instead of cams and a 3" exhaust, get a better manifold. that will do more for your goal of higher HP than those 2 combined.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 07:55 PM
  #4  
mrandyk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Default

nice. good build man. i don't know anything at all about horsepower numbers and what kinds of mods make a lot of power.. however, i feel like you should be getting more than 403hp at 16psi? maybe the recommendations for a better manifold and retune with HG would be better? :thumbs up:
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 09:42 PM
  #5  
_Ninja_'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

16psi seems like a little too much for stock engine, no?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 04:46 AM
  #6  
myclue's Avatar
Gold Member
Gold Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,761
Likes: 46
Default

nice
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 04:48 AM
  #7  
tsanhd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,375
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

o0hh god whose holding the camera
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 22, 2011 | 06:19 AM
  #8  
clarkster009's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 4
Default

Ugh I hate gallery posts with links to video..post pictures! Can't watch video at work.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 07:00 AM
  #9  
MugenAp2S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,512
Likes: 0
Default

Reply
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 07:50 PM
  #10  
barhonda_s2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: In the Mountains of PA
Default

I would love to have the Pfab elt manifold. And yes stock head gasket would make more power on lower psi. But as of now its still 403hp and to me is plenty fast enough. With the 3mm headgasket it puts my compression pretty low, I think around 9:1 if I remember correctly but not exactly sure. In the future I will work out what you can call bugs I guess. Headgasket manifold exhaust and so on. Also its a log manifold but still stainless steel. Its not cast. But thanks everyone.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jaundice
S2000 Forced Induction
74
Nov 22, 2013 12:00 AM
barhonda_s2k
S2000 Forced Induction
18
Aug 22, 2011 08:31 PM
corners2
S2000 Forced Induction
5
Oct 27, 2009 09:54 PM
Central Florida Turbo
S2000 Forced Induction
31
Sep 27, 2008 08:20 PM
ShMooveS2k
San Diego S2000 Owners
12
Sep 9, 2007 12:38 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:05 AM.