The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

JAGUAR C-X75

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #11  
9kred's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
From: Arizona PHX
Default

1,187 torque and 0-62 takes 3.4 seconds... Not saying its not fast but the current 911 turbo does it better with half the torque or more then half and less power. Hopefully they do a better job at putting that power down.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 05:45 PM
  #12  
crank's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 1
Default

do not want
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 05:49 PM
  #13  
clarkster009's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by CT S2K,Oct 21 2010, 05:18 PM
no it never did 220mph stock. best it did was 217mph. orignally they named it XJ220 cause it was said it will come with V12 and will be 220mph. people have to preoder the car before Jaguar will make it. next thing you know it comes with a V6 twin turbo and 217mph top speed.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 06:50 PM
  #14  
civic-si 2003's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Default

damn iRobot type s**t haha tight anyways
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 06:54 PM
  #15  
aDoG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
From: Louisville,KY
Default

Originally Posted by 9kred,Oct 21 2010, 05:20 PM
1,187 torque and 0-62 takes 3.4 seconds... Not saying its not fast but the current 911 turbo does it better with half the torque or more then half and less power. Hopefully they do a better job at putting that power down.
I believe the 911 turbo went from 0-60 in 2.7 secs

And yea that thing looks awsome looks fake lol
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 07:02 PM
  #16  
UniqueS2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,369
Likes: 0
From: SOBE
Default

I like the gauges how it says "turbine1 & turbine2"
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 10:22 PM
  #17  
UmarS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,678
Likes: 0
Default

Seems like a pointless vehicle if actually put into production but also seems cool.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 02:16 AM
  #18  
jonner's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 17,393
Likes: 19
From: Kiltokyo
Default

Reply
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 02:40 AM
  #19  
hk_s2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 73,565
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

cool factor
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 04:18 AM
  #20  
charliec225's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

I feel like the eyes, I mean headlights, are too far apart.

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:17 AM.