im not anything you could call knowlegable in this stuff but to me, after reading all 4 pages, it seems that the bigger the shot (as in area) is the more toyish it looks. what i mean is that the more depth you have (item of focus small compared to actualy shot) the easier it is to make it look believeable.

example of what im saying.

this first one is a bad picutre to do this with because there is no real area around teh cars to destroy the depth if you will---->>



this one on the other hand is a large picture as far as depth and volume goes so when you apply the affect to the picture it is much more true looking.---->>




just my opinion tho. some of these pictures really dont pull off the affect at all and some of them are so good that you really cant tell if they are real cars or not.