Mugen'd out Honda Jazz (FIT)
Former Moderator
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 0
From: middle of a corn field
Originally Posted by freq,Dec 27 2007, 08:55 PM
Why do people still quote pics? 
Nobody replied.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Tustin, CA
Originally Posted by s2kadrenalin,Dec 27 2007, 04:09 PM
The car is nice, but it has NOTHING on Hinezz's K24 Turbo conversion Jazz here in Brisbane.
http://www.ozhonda.com/forum/showthread.php?t=69706
http://www.ozhonda.com/forum/showthread.php?t=69706
That right there is the definition of ricer. Granted, he has made it look better since then and added a lot of power, but IMO it still looks like a minivan on crack. The one wantone posted was at least tasteful, although I'm not a fan of the color or the CF hood.
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,509
Likes: 1
From: Brisbane
Originally Posted by Bloodred,Dec 27 2007, 08:52 PM
How could you possibly think this looks good?
That right there is the definition of ricer. Granted, he has made it look better since then and added a lot of power, but IMO it still looks like a minivan on crack. The one wantone posted was at least tasteful, although I'm not a fan of the color or the CF hood.
That right there is the definition of ricer. Granted, he has made it look better since then and added a lot of power, but IMO it still looks like a minivan on crack. The one wantone posted was at least tasteful, although I'm not a fan of the color or the CF hood.
So now fast forward now to 2007 / 08 and be sure to view the entire thread too......
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by Flite,Dec 27 2007, 12:14 PM
I'm not trying to be a hater here, I swear...
But what is the appeal of those things? They're even more minivan shaped than the previous model Civic Si (EP3??) and those cars were BLASTED for the way they looked. They're EXTREMELY slow too. I just don't get it. Don't get me wrong, I'd have one as a commuter car. I just don't get the appeal of spending as much money as the car cost new in upgrades. It's just not that kind of car to me.
But what is the appeal of those things? They're even more minivan shaped than the previous model Civic Si (EP3??) and those cars were BLASTED for the way they looked. They're EXTREMELY slow too. I just don't get it. Don't get me wrong, I'd have one as a commuter car. I just don't get the appeal of spending as much money as the car cost new in upgrades. It's just not that kind of car to me.
or . . . "why dump all that money in to a car when it is just a Honda?" or . . . "why would someone put such cheap/replicated parts on an s2k when it's a damn s2k?" and so onI'm with you on this one; the Fit really is just a mini, mini-van =). In the end, we differ in many ways, which is why it really doesn't make any since to question it.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Sydney AUSTRALIA
Originally Posted by s2kadrenalin,Dec 28 2007, 10:09 AM
The car is nice, but it has NOTHING on Hinezz's K24 Turbo conversion Jazz here in Brisbane.
http://www.ozhonda.com/forum/showthread.php?t=69706
http://www.ozhonda.com/forum/showthread.php?t=69706
This is what Hinezz's car looks like right now:
It also has NO interior at all in it's current state.
How can you say Eddie's car has "NOTHING" on that? More to the point, WHY would you say something like that? It's not really cool to put someone's car down like that in my opinion.
I love Eddie's Jazz. It's all quality parts (no fake/replica parts on it at all unlike Hinezz's car), only the best. He won't go wide body because Mugen don't sell the kit. All Hinezz's car has on Eddie's is the engine, and who says Eddie's not got engine plans?
