Official Enkei RPF1 Thread
Alright check this out. The 17x9 +45 w/ 255s all around has convinced me BUT:
* I'd like a staggered setup. Honda engineers did it like this for a reason.
* I HATE the convex fronts that most people run. Looks ugly as hell. Concave is the way to go on these wheels IMO.
SO, Im keeping the rears at 17x9 +45 w/ 255s but I'd like to run 17x8 on the fronts while having the same/or super similar concave degree as the rears and also the same amount of lip as the rears (Or again, super similar).
So maybe running 17x8 +38 w/ 235s fronts will achieve this. I understand offsets and wheel stuff but I need to draw this on paper to see the results. Reason I said +38 is because I know this is an available offset. Not sure about less, +20 would be ideal according to my calculations:
CONVERSION:
1 inch = 25.4 millimeter
So running an inch less on fronts means that so to achieve similar 'lip and concave degree' as seen in rears you would need to run +20 (Basically 45mm - 25mm = 20mm offset)
Hope everyone understood my explanation of what I want to do. Thoughts? Thanks
* I'd like a staggered setup. Honda engineers did it like this for a reason.
* I HATE the convex fronts that most people run. Looks ugly as hell. Concave is the way to go on these wheels IMO.
SO, Im keeping the rears at 17x9 +45 w/ 255s but I'd like to run 17x8 on the fronts while having the same/or super similar concave degree as the rears and also the same amount of lip as the rears (Or again, super similar).
So maybe running 17x8 +38 w/ 235s fronts will achieve this. I understand offsets and wheel stuff but I need to draw this on paper to see the results. Reason I said +38 is because I know this is an available offset. Not sure about less, +20 would be ideal according to my calculations:
CONVERSION:
1 inch = 25.4 millimeter
So running an inch less on fronts means that so to achieve similar 'lip and concave degree' as seen in rears you would need to run +20 (Basically 45mm - 25mm = 20mm offset)
Hope everyone understood my explanation of what I want to do. Thoughts? Thanks
Alright, just checked Enkei's website. The lowest offset for 17x8 is +35mm

This is good s***! I have a good feeling this will achieve the results. I guess +38 is not avail for 17x8 after all.
UPDATE!!
Never mind, this is what 17x8 +35mm looks like
Enkei RPF1 17x8 +35

This is good s***! I have a good feeling this will achieve the results. I guess +38 is not avail for 17x8 after all.
UPDATE!!
Never mind, this is what 17x8 +35mm looks like
Enkei RPF1 17x8 +35
Originally Posted by anarkia1ces,Feb 13 2010, 12:03 PM
Alright check this out. The 17x9 +45 w/ 255s all around has convinced me BUT:
* I'd like a staggered setup. Honda engineers did it like this for a reason.
* I HATE the convex fronts that most people run. Looks ugly as hell. Concave is the way to go on these wheels IMO.
SO, Im keeping the rears at 17x9 +45 w/ 255s but I'd like to run 17x8 on the fronts while having the same/or super similar concave degree as the rears and also the same amount of lip as the rears (Or again, super similar).
So maybe running 17x8 +38 w/ 235s fronts will achieve this. I understand offsets and wheel stuff but I need to draw this on paper to see the results. Reason I said +38 is because I know this is an available offset. Not sure about less, +20 would be ideal according to my calculations:
CONVERSION:
1 inch = 25.4 millimeter
So running an inch less on fronts means that so to achieve similar 'lip and concave degree' as seen in rears you would need to run +20 (Basically 45mm - 25mm = 20mm offset)
Hope everyone understood my explanation of what I want to do. Thoughts? Thanks

* I'd like a staggered setup. Honda engineers did it like this for a reason.
* I HATE the convex fronts that most people run. Looks ugly as hell. Concave is the way to go on these wheels IMO.
SO, Im keeping the rears at 17x9 +45 w/ 255s but I'd like to run 17x8 on the fronts while having the same/or super similar concave degree as the rears and also the same amount of lip as the rears (Or again, super similar).
So maybe running 17x8 +38 w/ 235s fronts will achieve this. I understand offsets and wheel stuff but I need to draw this on paper to see the results. Reason I said +38 is because I know this is an available offset. Not sure about less, +20 would be ideal according to my calculations:
CONVERSION:
1 inch = 25.4 millimeter
So running an inch less on fronts means that so to achieve similar 'lip and concave degree' as seen in rears you would need to run +20 (Basically 45mm - 25mm = 20mm offset)
Hope everyone understood my explanation of what I want to do. Thoughts? Thanks

Why not just go with a 17x9 +45 all around but stagger JUST the tires?
Originally Posted by JDMQuip,Feb 13 2010, 08:15 AM
I went to True Line in El Cajon. They got tired of me there. LOL. I was there 3 times in one week trying to get the right specs. All in all they're all cool. One of the workers there owns an S2K. 
Originally Posted by JDMQuip,Feb 13 2010, 04:00 PM
No matter what you're still going to have the convex front. All you're doing is making the wheel stick out a tad bit more in the front with the +38. Not only that you're going to have to do a lot of front fender work to make it fit.
Why not just go with a 17x9 +45 all around but stagger JUST the tires?
Why not just go with a 17x9 +45 all around but stagger JUST the tires?
Yeah I searched the alternatives and they are all convex
So i will stagger the tires. 255 rear and 235 front. Front will be streching a bit but shouldn't be that much.
Full set. Gold RPF1 17x9 +45
Im probly going to get mine from these guys, unless someone knows were I can get them cheaper.
Im probly going to get mine from these guys, unless someone knows were I can get them cheaper.
Originally Posted by S2K Medic,Feb 13 2010, 02:35 PM
I still want some 10" +18 rears!!! I have 9.5" +38 and I still have room, not much but it's more than I want.
anyways...
Do It!



