The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

Official Enkei RPF1 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 11:03 AM
  #3191  
CapoArgentino's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 0
Default

Alright check this out. The 17x9 +45 w/ 255s all around has convinced me BUT:

* I'd like a staggered setup. Honda engineers did it like this for a reason.
* I HATE the convex fronts that most people run. Looks ugly as hell. Concave is the way to go on these wheels IMO.

SO, Im keeping the rears at 17x9 +45 w/ 255s but I'd like to run 17x8 on the fronts while having the same/or super similar concave degree as the rears and also the same amount of lip as the rears (Or again, super similar).

So maybe running 17x8 +38 w/ 235s fronts will achieve this. I understand offsets and wheel stuff but I need to draw this on paper to see the results. Reason I said +38 is because I know this is an available offset. Not sure about less, +20 would be ideal according to my calculations:

CONVERSION:
1 inch = 25.4 millimeter

So running an inch less on fronts means that so to achieve similar 'lip and concave degree' as seen in rears you would need to run +20 (Basically 45mm - 25mm = 20mm offset)

Hope everyone understood my explanation of what I want to do. Thoughts? Thanks
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 11:11 AM
  #3192  
CapoArgentino's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 0
Default

Alright, just checked Enkei's website. The lowest offset for 17x8 is +35mm



This is good s***! I have a good feeling this will achieve the results. I guess +38 is not avail for 17x8 after all.

UPDATE!!

Never mind, this is what 17x8 +35mm looks like

Enkei RPF1 17x8 +35
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 11:28 AM
  #3193  
txs2knoah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,457
Likes: 0
From: Bayside
Default

This thread will live on.
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 01:35 PM
  #3194  
S2K Medic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Default

I still want some 10" +18 rears!!! I have 9.5" +38 and I still have room, not much but it's more than I want.
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 03:00 PM
  #3195  
JDMQuip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by anarkia1ces,Feb 13 2010, 12:03 PM
Alright check this out. The 17x9 +45 w/ 255s all around has convinced me BUT:

* I'd like a staggered setup. Honda engineers did it like this for a reason.
* I HATE the convex fronts that most people run. Looks ugly as hell. Concave is the way to go on these wheels IMO.

SO, Im keeping the rears at 17x9 +45 w/ 255s but I'd like to run 17x8 on the fronts while having the same/or super similar concave degree as the rears and also the same amount of lip as the rears (Or again, super similar).

So maybe running 17x8 +38 w/ 235s fronts will achieve this. I understand offsets and wheel stuff but I need to draw this on paper to see the results. Reason I said +38 is because I know this is an available offset. Not sure about less, +20 would be ideal according to my calculations:

CONVERSION:
1 inch = 25.4 millimeter

So running an inch less on fronts means that so to achieve similar 'lip and concave degree' as seen in rears you would need to run +20 (Basically 45mm - 25mm = 20mm offset)

Hope everyone understood my explanation of what I want to do. Thoughts? Thanks
No matter what you're still going to have the convex front. All you're doing is making the wheel stick out a tad bit more in the front with the +38. Not only that you're going to have to do a lot of front fender work to make it fit.

Why not just go with a 17x9 +45 all around but stagger JUST the tires?
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #3196  
S_special's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 3
From: OC, CA
Default

Originally Posted by JDMQuip,Feb 13 2010, 08:15 AM
I went to True Line in El Cajon. They got tired of me there. LOL. I was there 3 times in one week trying to get the right specs. All in all they're all cool. One of the workers there owns an S2K.
wtf. el cajon, i use to live in that city. is that a flat rack?
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 04:22 PM
  #3197  
CapoArgentino's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JDMQuip,Feb 13 2010, 04:00 PM
No matter what you're still going to have the convex front. All you're doing is making the wheel stick out a tad bit more in the front with the +38. Not only that you're going to have to do a lot of front fender work to make it fit.

Why not just go with a 17x9 +45 all around but stagger JUST the tires?
You are 100% correct

Yeah I searched the alternatives and they are all convex

So i will stagger the tires. 255 rear and 235 front. Front will be streching a bit but shouldn't be that much.
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 06:48 PM
  #3198  
CapoArgentino's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 0
Default

Full set. Gold RPF1 17x9 +45



Im probly going to get mine from these guys, unless someone knows were I can get them cheaper.
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 06:53 PM
  #3199  
JDMQuip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Default

^- That's a good price.
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 06:55 PM
  #3200  
Ezekiel55's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by S2K Medic,Feb 13 2010, 02:35 PM
I still want some 10" +18 rears!!! I have 9.5" +38 and I still have room, not much but it's more than I want.
Damn man! That would look good. You think that would fit with just rolled and pulled rears? I'm thinking you'd have to cut your fenders...
anyways...
Do It!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:05 PM.