The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

R35 vs R34 size

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 01:43 AM
  #11  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Telephoto shot. Makes the car behind look WAY huge relative to car in front. Optical confusion.

Still, the car is obscenely huge and overweight (which the R34 was already anyway).

If you want an overweight, overpriced, overwrought uberwundermegacar, this flying pig should float yer boat. For me, smaller/lighter/simpler/cheaper = smarter and way the hell more fun.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 02:57 AM
  #12  
Jack_in_the_Box's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,293
Likes: 11
From: CaliFornicatin'
Default

they feed it other GT-Rs when no one is looking. Thing needs to get on the kanye work out plan. i can only imagine what its gonna look like when a widebody kit comes out.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 05:58 AM
  #13  
Dan H's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 814
Likes: 16
From: San Francisco/San Jose
Default




Oh its big.....and ugly.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 06:47 AM
  #14  
Sinji's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 2
From: Sunny Socal
Default

definately hugh!

I still love the r33's though! it has a classier look to me!
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 07:20 AM
  #15  
hyper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,241
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by Sinji,Jan 17 2008, 10:47 AM
definately hugh!

I still love the r33's though! it has a classier look to me!
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 09:15 AM
  #16  
Billj747's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 25
From: SoFlo
Default

Originally Posted by Sinji,Jan 17 2008, 07:47 AM
definately hugh!

I still love the r33's though! it has a classier look to me!
But they're pigs.

I liked the 32 much more than the 33 (which felt worse than an AWD supra), a lot lighter and more nimble. Still need to drive a 34 though..
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 09:20 AM
  #17  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

its about as big as a GT500. its a big car.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 09:23 AM
  #18  
Sinji's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 2
From: Sunny Socal
Default

Originally Posted by Billj747,Jan 17 2008, 10:15 AM
But they're pigs.

I liked the 32 much more than the 33 (which felt worse than an AWD supra), a lot lighter and more nimble. Still need to drive a 34 though..
AWD Supra?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #19  
Billj747's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 25
From: SoFlo
Default

Originally Posted by Sinji,Jan 17 2008, 10:23 AM
AWD Supra?
lol. it feels worse and floatier than a supra that's awd
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 10:26 AM
  #20  
nichigo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,586
Likes: 4
From: San Diego, CA
Default

it may be a pig, but it gets all it's power down to the tire contact patches...that's what counts. I have only heard good things about the performace of the GTR...wouldn't mind owning one...but the paddle shifters turn me off
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:20 AM.