The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

TEASER

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 09:28 AM
  #71  
wOlLeyLaBeL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Heart of the City
Default

those look more like 17x9+22 then 17x9.5+35 to little lip and it concaves to much to me atleast...
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 09:31 AM
  #72  
HUYS2200's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 19,157
Likes: 0
Default

I'd NOT listen to what Don is saying....he's just messing with you guys so you can't judge the size and offsets of the wheels and/or setup that he wants to run!





















Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 09:50 AM
  #73  
Dr. WOT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,642
Likes: 0
From: Easton
Default

Come for the teaser, stay for the P0WNAGE.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 09:58 AM
  #74  
BSeriouS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,013
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by HUYS2200' date='Jan 28 2009, 10:31 AM
I'd NOT listen to what Don is saying....he's just messing with you guys so you can't judge the size and offsets of the wheels and/or setup that he wants to run!





















haha no not at all! I swear! Promise!

The 9.5 +28 CE looks like a 9+40 with a bigger lip, but the 9.5 +35 DOES have a concave from looking at HH-s2000s car. It can't be a 9 +22 because it will stick out a lot more, and also this has a much more bigger lip than a 9 +22. 9.5 +35. Done
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 09:59 AM
  #75  
HUYS2200's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 19,157
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BSeriouS' date='Jan 28 2009, 10:58 AM
haha no not at all! I swear! Promise!

The 9.5 +28 CE looks like a 9+40 with a bigger lip
just messing with you
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 10:04 AM
  #76  
BSeriouS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,013
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by HUYS2200' date='Jan 28 2009, 10:59 AM
just messing with you
I know
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #77  
lovin_s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,242
Likes: 0
From: torrance 310
Default

i think everyone is getting confussed
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 02:01 PM
  #78  
lychyrychy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: UCLA FTW!
Default

Originally Posted by nichigo' date='Jan 27 2009, 05:20 PM



That looks like alot of lip...unless he gave inaccurate information about the rear wheel spec
Sorry to threadjack but can someone tell me what kinda modification was done to the quarter panel?

That shit is hot because look at the offset on those wheels...
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 04:14 PM
  #79  
SpaS2K2005's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 0
From: south east georgia
Default

if youre talkin about the rear fender its just pulled really really really far out lol.... the fronts are Js pieces.....
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 04:31 PM
  #80  
Jackbonin007's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 652
Likes: 3
Default

for the front 17x8 offset 48 or 17x9 offset 42?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:39 PM.