Tempting...
Originally Posted by btstone84,Jun 23 2008, 01:00 PM
affort(wtf)
AWD and Turbo cars are faster than RWD NA car's. Thats just plain fact. If you can have Turbo and AWD and keep weight down or similar to an NA RWD car you will almost always win. They restrict these car's with weight penalties in almost every racing series and they prohibit AWD and Turbos in F1 racing because of safety a long time ago due to the speeds the car's were obtaining.
What idiot book are people reading when they find info. like, "AWD turbos bog at high speed?" That's the most rediculous thing I've heard, turbos if anything almost always give more HP, Torque, and with the use of proper gearing never have problems with bogging at high speeds.
So that said, I like the S2000 over the EVO X for one, the S2000 is a drivers sports car, it takes 100% driving input to drive the car fast, not some S-AWD and dynamic control computer aids. Two, I love lightweight cars, it's not the lightest roadster but it feels lighter than what it is. From what I hear, you can really feel the EVO's weight which I know I would not enjoy. Third, to me, it really isn't that attractive, yes the front is aggressize but everything else is weak IMO.
Overall, the EVO XI and X are awesome cars, their just not the type of vehicle I want when it comes to finding a nice drivers car that is reliable on and off the track.
Originally Posted by Highrpmek,Jun 23 2008, 11:35 AM
I don't want to get involved but dude, please, you should not be correcting other peoples spelling or grammar. Your posts have a small similarity to the english language and that's about it. It took me 15 minutes to read your 4 attempts at a sentence.
AWD and Turbo cars are faster than RWD NA car's. Thats just plain fact. If you can have Turbo and AWD and keep weight down or similar to an NA RWD car you will almost always win. They restrict these car's with weight penalties in almost every racing series and they prohibit AWD and Turbos in F1 racing because of safety a long time ago due to the speeds the car's were obtaining.
What idiot book are people reading when they find info. like, "AWD turbos bog at high speed?" That's the most rediculous thing I've heard, turbos if anything almost always give more HP, Torque, and with the use of proper gearing never have problems with bogging at high speeds.
So that said, I like the S2000 over the EVO X for one, the S2000 is a drivers sports car, it takes 100% driving input to drive the car fast, not some S-AWD and dynamic control computer aids. Two, I love lightweight cars, it's not the lightest roadster but it feels lighter than what it is. From what I hear, you can really feel the EVO's weight which I know I would not enjoy. Third, to me, it really isn't that attractive, yes the front is aggressize but everything else is weak IMO.
Overall, the EVO XI and X are awesome cars, their just not the type of vehicle I want when it comes to finding a nice drivers car that is reliable on and off the track.
AWD and Turbo cars are faster than RWD NA car's. Thats just plain fact. If you can have Turbo and AWD and keep weight down or similar to an NA RWD car you will almost always win. They restrict these car's with weight penalties in almost every racing series and they prohibit AWD and Turbos in F1 racing because of safety a long time ago due to the speeds the car's were obtaining.
What idiot book are people reading when they find info. like, "AWD turbos bog at high speed?" That's the most rediculous thing I've heard, turbos if anything almost always give more HP, Torque, and with the use of proper gearing never have problems with bogging at high speeds.
So that said, I like the S2000 over the EVO X for one, the S2000 is a drivers sports car, it takes 100% driving input to drive the car fast, not some S-AWD and dynamic control computer aids. Two, I love lightweight cars, it's not the lightest roadster but it feels lighter than what it is. From what I hear, you can really feel the EVO's weight which I know I would not enjoy. Third, to me, it really isn't that attractive, yes the front is aggressize but everything else is weak IMO.
Overall, the EVO XI and X are awesome cars, their just not the type of vehicle I want when it comes to finding a nice drivers car that is reliable on and off the track.
im turbo and i cant imagine and S that doesnt want it. so im basing off my car
Oh, and quoting from the back of a R&T magazine, as tested, the S2000 CR was electronically limited at a Top speed of 150mph, the EVO GSR, 162mph. Maybe is wasn't elect. limited, maybe it just bogged. Either way, it's simply embarrassing the S2000 by 12mph. Oh, and I think it's a 5 speed.
Originally Posted by Highrpmek,Jun 23 2008, 11:55 AM
Ohh, I got you, my bad. I think I saw a video of the AWD Turbo Veyron bogging and your S2000 passed him. Silly me.



