The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

XA's Official CLEAN S2K THREAD...

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 05:37 PM
  #91  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

[QUOTE=Mulder ATO,Aug 4 2006, 07:29 PM] Trust me, I'll whore like crazy!
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 05:43 PM
  #92  
mr_grand_prix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,590
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio,TX
Default

am i worthy...car is in my sig....let me know..my feelings wont be hurt....
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 05:43 PM
  #93  
ruexp67's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 79,195
Likes: 18
From: Home
Default

Originally Posted by XclusiveAutosports,Aug 4 2006, 07:30 PM
I think your car is more wild than clean, but I still think it flows with the CF parts against the silver paint. I just think it is more wild than clean overall. I like your car a lot, just don't think its "clean" with all the CF. Don't take that as a bad thing though, your car looks super-aggressive.


Plus the sticker (even if you get all the tires you could ever want from sponsership) is enough to no longer be considered "clean" IMNSHO.
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 05:44 PM
  #94  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

Also, this was the problem with WRS2K's threads.....he was honest, and people took it personally. Some people dont want to hear that a mod they did doesnt look good or whatever. Hence, no honest opinions are shared.
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #95  
ruexp67's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 79,195
Likes: 18
From: Home
Default

Originally Posted by NFRs2000NYC,Aug 4 2006, 08:37 PM
Basically, only about 1/2 of the applicants would be approved by me if I were to be the judge. I am by no means saying their cars are ugly, but IMHO, and ONLY IMHO, they are NOT clean.


Crap! I agree with Dave!? That's TWICE this year.

Oh well, at least it's nothing electronic we are agreeing on, THAT would be horrible.
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 06:00 PM
  #96  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by ruexp67,Aug 4 2006, 08:46 PM


Crap! I agree with Dave!? That's TWICE this year.

Oh well, at least it's nothing electronic we are agreeing on, THAT would be horrible.
Zip it!

Actually, the last time you agreed with me was in 2005, so you are still good.
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 06:02 PM
  #97  
MULDER's Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,936
Likes: 12
From: Charleston
Default

Old Aug 4, 2006 | 06:04 PM
  #98  
ruexp67's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 79,195
Likes: 18
From: Home
Default

Originally Posted by NFRs2000NYC,Aug 4 2006, 09:00 PM
Actually, the last time you agreed with me was in 2005, so you are still good.
No it was in 2006!!!






























































Ahhhh, that's better.
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 06:05 PM
  #99  
GotRPMs's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 5
Default

What about me :/
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 06:13 PM
  #100  
tnep's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, CA
Default

Originally Posted by MrMacK,Aug 4 2006, 12:47 PM


so clean. expensive parts too! looks good. i know it's hard nowadays to separate yourself from the crowd of spa's out there, but i, personally, would paint the rest of the r1 bumper, so it wont take my eyes off of the hardtop and lm's too much.. but thats just my two cents. nice car though.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:47 PM.