S2000 Modifications and Parts Discussions about aftermarket products and parts including reviews, information and opinion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

AFR sensor attachment

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 4, 2011 | 06:35 AM
  #1  
Riviera's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Perth, WA
Default AFR sensor attachment

Is that the right placement for the AFR sensor? Also aftermarket header seems to have two holes for AFR (one for OEM and other for aftermarket) for example with J's header, is this correct?

What is the best wideband AFR sensor? Is AEM Uego Kit any good?

Cheers
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2011 | 03:26 PM
  #2  
steven975's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: Vienna, VA
Default

I have mine mounted at the end of the manifold, pointing almost horizontally mounted on the passenger side of the manifold. It made routing the wire so it doesn't touch the pipe tricky, but I zip tied it to the 2 other O2 sensor wires. We'll see how it holds up.

For a wideband, before the cat is optimal, and at least 18" from the head.

Putting the bung on there was a $15 job.

I use the AEM Wideband UEGO kit. I can't complain. Install is pretty easy, really.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2011 | 05:58 PM
  #3  
Riviera's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Perth, WA
Default

Originally Posted by steven975
I have mine mounted at the end of the manifold, pointing almost horizontally mounted on the passenger side of the manifold. It made routing the wire so it doesn't touch the pipe tricky, but I zip tied it to the 2 other O2 sensor wires. We'll see how it holds up.

For a wideband, before the cat is optimal, and at least 18" from the head.

Putting the bung on there was a $15 job.

I use the AEM Wideband UEGO kit. I can't complain. Install is pretty easy, really.
Zip tie looks ok but I am worried about the cable itself as the route is exposed to header's heat and may fail along the track. If you ask me I am thinking to get myself some sort of flexible conduit and run it through zip-tied with the OEM O2 wire.

If you look at the header image below, it looks to me before the flange there are 2 holes ?? One for OEM and one for AFR O2 sensor? Can J's header user confirm this please?



Where did you get your AEM UEGO? Got any pic?
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2011 | 06:31 PM
  #4  
MP2k's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 489
Likes: 13
From: Lincoln, CA
Default

I added mine in the stock header just about like the one in the picture you posted. Its worked great for me for the most part. The only issue I have is after extended periods of running wide open on the autobahn the sensor throws an overheating code. This is after 10 or so km running WOT at speeds between 230-250kph. I need to make a heat sink like it says in the directions. All the time I had it in the states though I never had a problem. Theres simply not very many places where you can run WOT long enough. I'm running the Innovate Motosports LC-1 kit with their DB gauge. I've read a few places that the LC-1 is one of the better controllers, IDK. I've got the AEM on my other car and it's worked fine for me too.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2011 | 07:59 PM
  #5  
Riviera's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Perth, WA
Default

Originally Posted by MP2k
I added mine in the stock header just about like the one in the picture you posted. Its worked great for me for the most part. The only issue I have is after extended periods of running wide open on the autobahn the sensor throws an overheating code. This is after 10 or so km running WOT at speeds between 230-250kph. I need to make a heat sink like it says in the directions. All the time I had it in the states though I never had a problem. Theres simply not very many places where you can run WOT long enough. I'm running the Innovate Motosports LC-1 kit with their DB gauge. I've read a few places that the LC-1 is one of the better controllers, IDK. I've got the AEM on my other car and it's worked fine for me too.
Heatsink? Where do they ask you to mount it? When you WOT obviously the heat ramps up to the maximum. Overheating maybe because the sensor calibration is off or some exhaust gas leaks through the custom hole creating pressurised heat? Dunno I'm just guessing there

So you did drill another hole like that header pic I posted?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2011 | 07:34 AM
  #6  
MP2k's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 489
Likes: 13
From: Lincoln, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Riviera
Originally Posted by MP2k' timestamp='1307241090' post='20649825
I added mine in the stock header just about like the one in the picture you posted. Its worked great for me for the most part. The only issue I have is after extended periods of running wide open on the autobahn the sensor throws an overheating code. This is after 10 or so km running WOT at speeds between 230-250kph. I need to make a heat sink like it says in the directions. All the time I had it in the states though I never had a problem. Theres simply not very many places where you can run WOT long enough. I'm running the Innovate Motosports LC-1 kit with their DB gauge. I've read a few places that the LC-1 is one of the better controllers, IDK. I've got the AEM on my other car and it's worked fine for me too.
Heatsink? Where do they ask you to mount it? When you WOT obviously the heat ramps up to the maximum. Overheating maybe because the sensor calibration is off or some exhaust gas leaks through the custom hole creating pressurised heat? Dunno I'm just guessing there

So you did drill another hole like that header pic I posted?


Yes, I drilled a new hole. It's just getting too hot. I doubt there is ANY place in the exhaust that doesn't exceed 900F before the cat on a hard run. I took the stock manifold off to ensure I could run a good bead around the new bung as it's positioned close to vertical. Ideally, the best position is between 10:00 and 2:00.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 11:10 AM
  #7  
Croc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 10
From: Israel
Default

this is when stock header's heatshields become handy - one of them protetcts O2 sensor (among other things)
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 12:24 PM
  #8  
K1LL3R 1NS1D3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

The Innovate LC-1 as stated above is the best affordable kit on the market. Most accurate and fastest response times. The Innovates response times is really what set its apart from all the other kits out there. AEM widebands actually have the most lag, neither a half second or more which would steer me away from one of those which it did. Im running the Innovate LC-1 wideband with the XD-16 gauge. At $300 retail for the full XD-16 it is more expensive but you also add the ability to hook your laptop straight into the gauge and with the record button thats on the gauge you are able to datalog your afr in Innovates log works software. You can also fully adjust the color of each of the LEDs around the perimeter individually to any color you want. Neat feature that really sets this gauge apart from the rest.

heres the best deal i found on a complete xd-16 with lc-1, complete kit out of the box just need to weld in the bung which is also included
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Innov...motiveQ5fTools
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jaspah
S2000 Forced Induction
2
Nov 5, 2015 01:13 PM
lopez14
S2000 Under The Hood
4
Nov 7, 2013 11:51 AM
RedSunS2K
S2000 Forced Induction
6
Sep 18, 2012 02:00 PM
duanet85
S2000 Under The Hood
3
Sep 6, 2007 07:01 PM
tomas
S2000 Under The Hood
16
Nov 7, 2003 05:04 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:05 AM.