Terahertz: What did you think about the comfort level compared to pss9?

 

big step down in comfort. la freeways are really bad, and the pss9's at 4/4 were not bad, little rough. hks at 20/20 are much stiffer on big bumps, but still smooth on sorta smooth roads. but when i say much stiffer, my gf can't even hold two cups of coffee and i have to drive 55 mph lol. havent tried full soft yet, but honestly i like it stiffer, my gf doesnt

if you have smooth roads where you are, its really quite good.

 

whoa!--you put the hks at 20/20 for daily driving!? i usually bump it up to around there for the track, but before i head home, i turn mine down to 10/5. i tried driving home on ~20 before and yeah, it was pretty crazy. the car was bouncing over some bigger bumps.

 

[QUOTE=Orpheus,Feb 27 2009, 08:55 AM] whoa!--you put the hks at 20/20 for daily driving!?

 

yeah what he said sorry lol

i got used to 1 being stiffest since thats how it was on the pss9's

 

i assumed 1 being stiffest also since it's clockwise... plus that's how the manual specified it

 

How much lower does the car sit at the HKS recommended height? And would they be too rough for the SoCal canyons? (Malibu/GMR/Angeles Crest)

 

here is my car at the recommended height right after install

 

Nice wheels and tires, tek. Doesn't look too low, but do you happen to know how much lower it really sits? It looks like maybe 2cm/~1 inch? My concern are the canyon roads I drive on are not always smooth and silky. On some sections I do scrape the plastic guard that's in front of the front wheels (currently stock ride height).

 

it's a little bit lower than when i had eibachs, so a bit more than 1", but not much.