S2000 Modifications and Parts Discussions about aftermarket products and parts including reviews, information and opinion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

My ebay experience

Thread Tools
 
Old May 4, 2011 | 06:04 PM
  #1  
jordannn93's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
From: Olyphant, Pa
Default My ebay experience











http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/00-07...Q5fAccessories


Overall the product wasn't bad for the price. I definitely noticed a gain in power. More so on the top end i think. The only thing i have to get is a new filter. This filter is just a joke, just a metal screen filter? Seems pretty bad. I am going to end up getting a kn or aem filter. The only thing i replaced was 2 of the hoses that they gave me. They just didnt have a tight fit.

All in all everything fit and lined up good, i would recommend this if your on a budget.

Oh btw does anyone know if the filter from the kn/aem cai will fit this? it has a 3" opening
Reply
Old May 4, 2011 | 08:12 PM
  #2  
romeo2's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 126
Likes: 5
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Not trying to rain on your parade but....too many changes in direction between the intake and the airbox at the engine - the friction and inertial losses associated with this tortuous path destroys the free-flow of air to the engine - it will not "breath freely". You don't want to have the engine having to do extra work to get the air to the intake valves because any work done here is a net reduction in horsepower output. As nice as it might look you will get what you pay for and this might be less than you expected. The filter alone would have been my first clue. There is a reason that the PRM is so successful - it is direct, it is tuned (frictional losses are minimized) and it has a great filter to protect your engine from the effects of particulate matter in the air that is mostly like digesting glass (called sand and dust). If you can get a K&N filter onto the end I would do it quickly before I drove anywhere. Good luck.
Reply
Old May 4, 2011 | 08:35 PM
  #3  
s2cho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 7
Default

Reply
Old May 4, 2011 | 09:32 PM
  #4  
dc2-2-ap1's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,358
Likes: 31
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

The straighter the flow the better-yes
But it has around the same amount of bends as the aem or injen cai.
But you need to replace that filter with a k&n or aem dryflow (I love my dryflow) as soon as possible.
Reply
Old May 4, 2011 | 10:14 PM
  #5  
H22toF20's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2
From: Clatskanie, OR
Default

Originally Posted by romeo2
Not trying to rain on your parade but....too many changes in direction between the intake and the airbox at the engine - the friction and inertial losses associated with this tortuous path destroys the free-flow of air to the engine - it will not "breath freely". You don't want to have the engine having to do extra work to get the air to the intake valves because any work done here is a net reduction in horsepower output. As nice as it might look you will get what you pay for and this might be less than you expected. The filter alone would have been my first clue. There is a reason that the PRM is so successful - it is direct, it is tuned (frictional losses are minimized) and it has a great filter to protect your engine from the effects of particulate matter in the air that is mostly like digesting glass (called sand and dust). If you can get a K&N filter onto the end I would do it quickly before I drove anywhere. Good luck.
Doesn't change the fact that it'll make power due to the resonance and the slightly colder air(more so with a tune). The PRM imo is a joke. If you want a shorter pipe style, the FIPK is more ideal to the heat shield. I love the set-up I have now: FIPK box, ebay 3" pipe, BPI velocity stack, K&N filter, AUT cooling plate.

To the OP, get a K&N filter and/or see if you can fit a velocity stack on the end of it.
Reply
Old May 4, 2011 | 10:52 PM
  #6  
MBHs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,875
Likes: 5
From: Santa Clartia, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by romeo2
Not trying to rain on your parade but....too many changes in direction between the intake and the airbox at the engine - the friction and inertial losses associated with this tortuous path destroys the free-flow of air to the engine - it will not "breath freely". You don't want to have the engine having to do extra work to get the air to the intake valves because any work done here is a net reduction in horsepower output. As nice as it might look you will get what you pay for and this might be less than you expected. The filter alone would have been my first clue. There is a reason that the PRM is so successful - it is direct, it is tuned (frictional losses are minimized) and it has a great filter to protect your engine from the effects of particulate matter in the air that is mostly like digesting glass (called sand and dust). If you can get a K&N filter onto the end I would do it quickly before I drove anywhere. Good luck.
The PRM is considered one of the worst when it comes to power increases.....
For the price this intake looks very good. I would get a K&N filter and see how you like it than. How does the intake sound?
Reply
Old May 5, 2011 | 02:42 AM
  #7  
jordannn93's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
From: Olyphant, Pa
Default

I have an aem coming tomorrow. It sounds great I like it .

What's a velocity stack?
Reply

Trending Topics

Old May 5, 2011 | 04:55 AM
  #8  
nofearofdanger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

Originally Posted by MBHs2k
Originally Posted by romeo2' timestamp='1304568762' post='20540384
Not trying to rain on your parade but....too many changes in direction between the intake and the airbox at the engine - the friction and inertial losses associated with this tortuous path destroys the free-flow of air to the engine - it will not "breath freely". You don't want to have the engine having to do extra work to get the air to the intake valves because any work done here is a net reduction in horsepower output. As nice as it might look you will get what you pay for and this might be less than you expected. The filter alone would have been my first clue. There is a reason that the PRM is so successful - it is direct, it is tuned (frictional losses are minimized) and it has a great filter to protect your engine from the effects of particulate matter in the air that is mostly like digesting glass (called sand and dust). If you can get a K&N filter onto the end I would do it quickly before I drove anywhere. Good luck.
The PRM is considered one of the worst when it comes to power increases.....
For the price this intake looks very good. I would get a K&N filter and see how you like it than. How does the intake sound?
Do you have data to back this up? Don't make unsubstantiated claims unless you give us some proof.



Reply
Old May 5, 2011 | 05:16 AM
  #9  
jsenclosure's Avatar
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,324
Likes: 206
From: Ballston Spa, NY
Default

Originally Posted by dc2-2-ap1
The straighter the flow the better-yes
But it has around the same amount of bends as the aem or injen cai.
But, the AEM has a much larger diameter tube at the bottom end, which makes up for those losses

You get what you pay for, AEM cost 300- for a reason (testing, tuning, reasearch and design).
Reply
Old May 5, 2011 | 05:30 AM
  #10  
Importedpower's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 1
From: Columbia, South Carolina
Default

k&n FIPK, sounds good, some gains, no intake will give you anything much horsepower wise. but what a FIPK does is NOT suck up puddles in heavy rain, and require cutting and an incredible irritation to install it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:38 AM.