S2000 Modifications and Parts Discussions about aftermarket products and parts including reviews, information and opinion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

When did this tailight come out?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 07:37 PM
  #31  
s2k aok's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,616
Likes: 2
From: Lompoc CA
Default

had to open up that link again and take another gander, not too bad, i'd have to dull out that chrome and then get a black led third brake light, but, then i realized the price (didn't sink in the first time i looked at it), damn, nearly $400 shipped. maybe at $200 i'd take a shot at re-doing them as a little project but f*** no to $400, somehow it fits 2004-2008 but not 2009-2010 (sucks for us ap1 guys), you'd think they'd market the tails to ap1 owners as they are the ones most likely for the tail upgrade...
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 07:44 PM
  #32  
suzuka-blue-s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,783
Likes: 3
From: Liberal Kansas
Default

^ It would be pretty much impossible to make ap2 style tails for ap1's without having to cut the car, just like you have to if you put OEM ap2 tails in an ap1. I did it and its not too bad. It mostly has to do with where the reverse lights are. I sure as hell wouldnt cut my ap1 up for those things if thats all that was available. My 08 tails with harness and bulbs were only $330 shipped, OEM FTW!

Ohh and there isn't a 2010 s2000, and there is no difference between 08's and 09's, so that shows how much they know.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 07:47 PM
  #33  
s2k aok's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,616
Likes: 2
From: Lompoc CA
Default

yeah, if ap2's are cheaper and look better, why even bother with an aftermarket company. anyways, i went and copied their pic and saved it so i could post it here for reference instead of going through the link...

Reply
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 11:18 AM
  #34  
Croc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 10
From: Israel
Default

so unnecessary....
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 07:11 PM
  #35  
4winds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Default

these make absolutely no sense at all.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 02:01 AM
  #36  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

I won't comment on the looks, but I have this company's (Eagle Eyes) headlights on my 2010 CRV and they are pretty damn good quality. The front plastic is excellent and after 9 months, still looks brand new. The projector isn't s2000 level, but pretty damn good.

Just to clarify, they are NOT D.O.T. compliant. The headlights do have a stamp that says DOT, but not D.O.T which is what you need for "legal" lights.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 03:44 AM
  #37  
chef-j's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,696
Likes: 1
From: NY/MI/TX/S.Korea
Default

I think its not bad...idk maybe I'm ricer
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 05:33 AM
  #38  
HighwayStar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Miami FL
Default

if they fit right it would be a good buy for the casing and remove the lens and replace them with something else
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 10:01 AM
  #39  
Ap2batman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Default

looks better on a civic
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2010 | 10:55 AM
  #40  
HPCO$T's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Ok
Default

So I just saw them in personal SEMA quality looks there but they are a little flashy.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:06 AM.