***Official ITBs Thread***
10-16-2008, 04:53 PM
#31
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've found it very interesting that J's Racing doesn't use velocity stacks on their f22c motors like Toda does for ASM or like J's does for its own Fit racer. I wonder what the J's motor at 13:0 compression would make with velocity stacks and no intake manifold. This is their most recent setup, though.
http://cars.ign.com/dor/articles/860338/au...8035751253.html
http://cars.ign.com/dor/articles/860338/au...8035751253.html
10-16-2008, 05:32 PM
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Parrish, FL
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVAN&MONICA,Oct 4 2008, 07:47 AM
^I think ITBs are very beneficial but not cost sensible on boosted applications. I think some engines come from the factory with them and turbos the only one I can think of is the RB26(GTR/R32,33,34). I think anyone who knows better please chime in 
10-26-2008, 12:42 PM
#35
Registered User
Thread Starter
I may possible be going with ITBs(although I'm not sure what hat will do to me with points considering I want to get into Nasa TTC) once I can get everything I need for the conversion. Will do a full write up if this goes down.
10-26-2008, 07:53 PM
#38
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HUYS2200,Oct 26 2008, 07:40 PM
Hmmm....I'll believe it when I see it. Even if hp/tq were the same, throttle response is still the big winner for ITB's.
10-26-2008, 08:13 PM
#40
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On the BQE
Posts: 5,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Check out this cool ITB airbox folks.
http://www.mandm-honda.com/b_intake_6972_c_051.jpg
http://www.mandm-honda.com/partslist_intake_01.html
http://www.mandm-honda.com/b_intake_6972_c_051.jpg
http://www.mandm-honda.com/partslist_intake_01.html