S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum Discussions about N/A motor projects, builds and technology.

Ethanol comparison

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-19-2016, 01:10 PM
  #21  

 
yamahaSHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Greenwood, AR
Posts: 3,197
Received 122 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

I run 12.8:1 [gas-referenced] AFR and see ~70% IDC at 8,500 RPM. Using a stock FPR and now have a 155lph pump feeding it from a surge tank. Prior to the surge tank, I was using the stock pump to feed the system, but I don't remember seeing IDC's any higher with that (I still have the stock pump feeding the surge tank).
Old 05-20-2016, 02:45 AM
  #22  

 
flanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,060
Received 427 Likes on 363 Posts
Default

I thought 12 or even lower was beneficial, but I guess it's best to test yourself on each car and setup.
Thanks for your input
Old 05-20-2016, 05:54 AM
  #23  

Thread Starter
 
b.r.i.a.n.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: south florida
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flanders
I thought 12 or even lower was beneficial, but I guess it's best to test yourself on each car and setup.
Thanks for your input
Each engine is different. The afr range for peak performance is wide. Check out this video that Haltech released a few years ago regarding afr and ignition timing changes on a naturally aspirated engine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zzn3-ygH-v8
Old 05-20-2016, 08:00 AM
  #24  

 
yamahaSHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Greenwood, AR
Posts: 3,197
Received 122 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

This motor in NA form doesn't gain anything with a richer mixture.
Old 05-24-2016, 08:31 AM
  #25  

 
Mrsideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,723
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by b.r.i.a.n.
This afternoon, I retuned my AP1 once again. Since the last time, a few things have changed. I swapped the Haltech Sport 1000 ecu in favor of the Pro Plug In. I swapped over the 70mm throttle body in favor of a 74mm throttle body. I got rid of the velocity stack and just went with a 3.5 inch filter. I changed the 2.5 inch test pipe to 3 inch and I also added a fuel composition sensor. For those of you who did not see my previous thread, here's the link:

https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/909...tepped-intake/

At the moment the car has the following modifications:

diy stepped 3.5 inch to 3 inch intake with injen filter
- skunk2 74mm throttle body
- hondata intake manifold gasket
- plm header and 3 inch test pipe
- hks 3 inch single exhaust
- injector dynamic 1000cc injectors
- E85 fuel
- Haltech Pro Plug In ecu
- fuel composition sensor

The main reason for retuning apart from the minor bolt on changes is to do a comparison between pump gasoline and E85 fuel. There was still some ethanol in the tank when I poured some gasoline. I was able to get the ethanol blend down to 18%. I've seen the local gas stations averaging 9-10% ethanol in their gasoline. I tuned the car on E18 and the engine yielded 220-221 whp.

I then poured in 10 gallons of pump E85 from the local U-Gas. There was still some gasoline in the gas tank and after 10 gallons of E85 the mixture came out to E63. I have seen an average of 77-80% ethanol in the E85 sold at the local U-Gas. Had I drained the tank I may have seen that amount. The engine was retuned on the spot with the E63 blend.

The red and green line were the last two passes made on the E18 blend. The blue and black lines are the last two passes made on the E63 blend. As you can see, a 45% increases in ethanol yielded a gain of approximately 5-6 whp. I'm sure another 2 whp could have been squeezed out with the ethanol content closer to 80%.

So in conclusion, yes, even with a naturally aspirated engine the hype is real.

The Local Citgo station has E85 and the rumor is it's owned/operated by a drag racer who's very diligent about his E85 mix. So I grabbed some last night and brought it home and tested it and got it at 88% ethanol. I tested it twice to be sure and it came back the same. Excited to find that.
Old 05-25-2016, 06:35 AM
  #26  

Thread Starter
 
b.r.i.a.n.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: south florida
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mrsideways
The Local Citgo station has E85 and the rumor is it's owned/operated by a drag racer who's very diligent about his E85 mix. So I grabbed some last night and brought it home and tested it and got it at 88% ethanol. I tested it twice to be sure and it came back the same. Excited to find that.
Did you use one of those fuel test tubes that you mix with water? If so, I've noticed that those test tubes read a little high with regards to ethanol content. I prefer the fuel composition sensor.
Old 05-26-2016, 05:28 AM
  #27  

 
Mrsideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,723
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by b.r.i.a.n.
Originally Posted by Mrsideways' timestamp='1464107518' post='23975171
The Local Citgo station has E85 and the rumor is it's owned/operated by a drag racer who's very diligent about his E85 mix. So I grabbed some last night and brought it home and tested it and got it at 88% ethanol. I tested it twice to be sure and it came back the same. Excited to find that.
Did you use one of those fuel test tubes that you mix with water? If so, I've noticed that those test tubes read a little high with regards to ethanol content. I prefer the fuel composition sensor.
Yes, I used the test tube. Quick google search says the exact opposite that the test tubes are accurate and the electronic ones read on average 7% low.

I think a lot of the test tube issue could be user error. I tested multiple times before I trusted my results.
Old 05-26-2016, 07:59 AM
  #28  

 
yamahaSHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Greenwood, AR
Posts: 3,197
Received 122 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

They'll both be wrong if water was already absorbed.
Old 05-26-2016, 10:22 AM
  #29  

 
Mrsideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,723
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yamahaSHO
They'll both be wrong if water was already absorbed.
Good point. Any one make a tester for H20?
Old 05-26-2016, 04:28 PM
  #30  

 
s2000ellier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
Received 80 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

the sensor is all that matters if you are using it to control the fuel map in your flex fuel setup


Quick Reply: Ethanol comparison



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:50 PM.