S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum Discussions about N/A motor projects, builds and technology.

Proflow TB, Tapered or straight through

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-10-2008, 11:58 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
gregsju29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: philly
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what's the goal? I mean, if you gain 1 whp is it worth it? I personally don't think the TB would be on my top 5 mods to gain power
Old 10-10-2008, 12:00 PM
  #12  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Js S2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sad to see her go :,(
Posts: 6,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

of the OP Please!!!

With K&N intake, OEM intake manifold, OEM cams, J's header, T1r70 and re-tuned on eManage Ult.

Boring OEM TB or BDL 66mm TB = Better throttle response and under the curve gains or
Boring OEM TB or BDL 66mm TB= waiste of money??

Can people who have actually done either respond only please. I'm looking for solid facts not speculation.

My goal is better throttle response, and mid range gains.

Thanks

J's
Old 10-10-2008, 12:25 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
chimmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Parrish, FL
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm gonna be honest with you man.

Everyone says it's not worth it. Obviously with n/a we're paying lots for 1-2hp. IMO, if you're dedicated to the n/a route, which you seem to be as you tune for your mods, I'd say go with the 66mm tb.

But, I would ditch the K&N intake and pick up something like the comptech or Password JDM. I know it's bucks, but those coupled with the mods you have and a good tune, IMO, could net maybe 8-10hp under the curve. That's pretty significant for n/a modding.
Old 10-10-2008, 01:37 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
dparm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oak Park, IL
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you're serious about making the car faster, focus on packaging together parts that increase the area under the curve...and especially ones that do it within the engine's useable powerband and area of gearing.
Old 10-10-2008, 02:10 PM
  #15  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Js S2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sad to see her go :,(
Posts: 6,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chimmike,Oct 10 2008, 04:25 PM
I'm gonna be honest with you man.

Everyone says it's not worth it. Obviously with n/a we're paying lots for 1-2hp. IMO, if you're dedicated to the n/a route, which you seem to be as you tune for your mods, I'd say go with the 66mm tb.

But, I would ditch the K&N intake and pick up something like the comptech or Password JDM. I know it's bucks, but those coupled with the mods you have and a good tune, IMO, could net maybe 8-10hp under the curve. That's pretty significant for n/a modding.
Thanks

I am actually considering the pw jdm intake.
$1000 everything else, might as well have a $1000 intake , seems to be the curse of the N/A beast.
Old 10-10-2008, 02:11 PM
  #16  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Js S2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sad to see her go :,(
Posts: 6,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dparm,Oct 10 2008, 05:37 PM
If you're serious about making the car faster, focus on packaging together parts that increase the area under the curve...and especially ones that do it within the engine's useable powerband and area of gearing.
Thanks captain obvious
I'm already doing that with my J's header, 70mm single, soon to come pw jdm intake, or tuning with eManage Ult.

Sorry i don't mean to be rude but I've spent months reading on what makes power on this engine and what doesn't.
I'm looking for some advice from people who have personal experience with similar builds to mine since TB's are a very controversial item.

Thanks.
Old 10-11-2008, 08:10 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
S2Kage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,939
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Despite what everyone says, I am going to order a 70mm and port match my manifold myself and ill let ya know how it goes, until then, no one really has room to talk without back to back dynos.

Isn't the stock size 66mm?
Old 10-11-2008, 08:54 AM
  #18  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Js S2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sad to see her go :,(
Posts: 6,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S2Kage,Oct 11 2008, 12:10 PM
Despite what everyone says, I am going to order a 70mm and port match my manifold myself and ill let ya know how it goes, until then, no one really has room to talk without back to back dynos.

Isn't the stock size 66mm?
Stock is 62.5
Old 10-11-2008, 09:42 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
57udl3y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

start spending thousands on carbon fiber body parts
Old 10-11-2008, 09:47 AM
  #20  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Js S2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sad to see her go :,(
Posts: 6,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 57udl3y,Oct 11 2008, 01:42 PM
start spending thousands on carbon fiber body parts
Um Fail

Looking for mid range power since that's what we use not peak, and better throttle response.

I'm not dumping money into cf parts I'd rather just take stuff out, but that'll get negated by my Hard Dog roll bar.


Quick Reply: Proflow TB, Tapered or straight through



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 PM.