S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Bros Wing

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 19, 2012 | 06:16 PM
  #11  
99SH's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,677
Likes: 9
Default

Per Bros:

Although we do not have CFD simulation of our wing, this wing is directly from Hyundai Genesis Cup(Professional League).
It is one-make racing which all the Genesis coupe race cars are using our design for years already.
The bracket is specially re-designed to work with S2000.



I'd rather pay $1300 for an APR-300 wing which has analysis to back it up; rather than a copy of a wing off a Genesis.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2012 | 03:06 AM
  #12  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

Seeing how their brake pads were underengineered (faded under heavy braking and pad ears too thick), I wouldn't trust this wing or bracket design either.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2012 | 07:46 AM
  #13  
SLINKYDOG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: OMAHA
Default

the APR wing mounts in the stock location, so it has little to no effect of the trunk from flexing like my old H.P.M. wing did, i have ran the gtc 300 for over 2 season now and have never had any issues with it.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2012 | 08:18 AM
  #14  
maluch's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Lindehurst, NY
Default

if the genesis cup is a factory backed effort it probably has a lot more CFD R&D than the APR wing. what is the genesis cup anyway? is it an asian series? I did a quick search and could not find anything...

Also, any CFD that APR does on the wing is pretty much garbage if not done in conjunction with the body of the car it is mounted on. At our level of motorsports and the level of most rent-a-seat pro teams CFD analysis is not cost effective, misleading, and way too complicated. The only thing that works is empirical evidence.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2012 | 10:28 AM
  #15  
psychoazn's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,223
Likes: 4
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by maluch
if the genesis cup is a factory backed effort it probably has a lot more CFD R&D than the APR wing. what is the genesis cup anyway? is it an asian series? I did a quick search and could not find anything...

Also, any CFD that APR does on the wing is pretty much garbage if not done in conjunction with the body of the car it is mounted on. At our level of motorsports and the level of most rent-a-seat pro teams CFD analysis is not cost effective, misleading, and way too complicated. The only thing that works is empirical evidence.
Could not be better said.

The Bros. brake pads are not under-engineered. They just simply don't have the thermal capacity to live up to what the two reviewer's happened to need. The reviewers also fade XP10/8, which are extremely popular in this forum. CT pads have fitment issues of their own, but that's another story.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2012 | 12:09 PM
  #16  
f20kills's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,695
Likes: 13
From: Mom!!! The Meatloaf!!
Default

^^Yup, the "ears" on my XR1 Colbolts needed some trimming too....but I love those pads!!
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2012 | 02:04 PM
  #17  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

Dunno. I didn't fade Carbotech 10/8s when running 265 star specs and supercharged at Road America and didn't fade them on 285 Hoosier A6s when turbo'd at Brainerd.

A "hardcore" race pad shouldn't fade with street tires, IMHO.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2012 | 02:14 PM
  #18  
Antonov's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 3
From: San Diego
Default

I have, with RS3's.

Originally Posted by CKit
Dunno. I didn't fade Carbotech 10/8s when running 265 star specs and supercharged at Road America and didn't fade them on 285 Hoosier A6s when turbo'd at Brainerd.

A "hardcore" race pad shouldn't fade with street tires, IMHO.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2012 | 03:14 PM
  #19  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

Maybe track dependent? Both my tracks have long, cooling straights.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2012 | 03:24 PM
  #20  
Andrie's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 2
From: Concord, CA
Default

Originally Posted by maluch
if you will run the wing near the roof line, in clean air, stay away from the APR wing. its designed to be mounted and be most efficient near the trunk. for clean air efficiency use simpler, flatter wings.

for clean air aero the BROS wing doenst look that bad but untested its def not worth 1300

You wont see a professional team(grand am and WC)run an APR type of element and mount it near the roof line.
Well pro grand am and WC team can only run wings within regulation. For WC team for instance, the old touring car web I competed, the rule dictate it has to be 6" below roof line. For GT can not be higher than roof line. Wing profile also had to be approved by SCCA.

It is not a good guide towhat actually work best IMHO. The rule dictate what they can and can not run.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:43 PM.