Kumho V710 tires mounted backwards
When switching tires for an autocross yesterday, I noticed that two of my four V710s are mounted with the side which is supposed to be inside on the outside.
Does this matter enough to pay to have them reversed?
Does this matter enough to pay to have them reversed?
How recently did you have them mounted? Seems like the installer should switch 'em for free as they were installed wrong.
I don't know about the V710s, but I have turned my Hoosiers around mid-season to even out wear.
I don't know about the V710s, but I have turned my Hoosiers around mid-season to even out wear.
Originally Posted by Conedodger,Jan 23 2006, 01:23 PM
How recently did you have them mounted? Seems like the installer should switch 'em for free as they were installed wrong.
I don't know about the V710s, but I have turned my Hoosiers around mid-season to even out wear.
I don't know about the V710s, but I have turned my Hoosiers around mid-season to even out wear.
Is there any handling-related reason for the "inside/outside" label, especially on a wet (but no standing water) course?
Originally Posted by PedalFaster,Jan 23 2006, 01:33 PM
I believe the V710's carcass is symmetrical. The tread isn't, though, so the tire should theoretically be incrementally faster with the grooves on the inside instead of the outside.
My first R-compound tires were Michelin PSC, which claimed to have a slightly different compound on the "inside" and "outside" parts of the tread, for "wet" and "dry" conditions. As you once witnessed, I didn't notice that they were particularly good on a wet track, but I was kind of wondering if the V710s were somehow similar.
If the compound is the same across the face of the tire, I certainly don't care about a very slight possible improvement in worn tires, by flipping them.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fuman
Pacific Northwest S2000 Owners
0
Apr 2, 2011 06:52 PM
hansel
Upper Mid-West S2000 Owners
11
Dec 2, 2004 03:56 AM
s2kpdx01
Wheels and Tires
14
Jan 16, 2004 05:18 PM




