Maxrev's Nitto NT01 Review @ Streets
02-21-2006, 04:09 PM
#22
Administrator
[QUOTE=pantyraider,Feb 21 2006, 06:03 PM] I guess you meant STOCK as in S2000 challenge classification? I read it as in a completely stock car with R compounds.
02-21-2006, 04:13 PM
#23
Administrator
Originally Posted by maxrev,Feb 21 2006, 06:05 PM
I did a 1:31 on a stock, wheels, tires, everything (not stock s2ki class) S2000 with just pads.
I just wanted to do a tire review but everyone just want to prove that they are better. Its just an objective review people!
I just wanted to do a tire review but everyone just want to prove that they are better. Its just an objective review people!
02-21-2006, 04:18 PM
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim, Orange County
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pantyraider,Feb 21 2006, 05:03 PM
I guess you meant STOCK as in S2000 challenge classification? I read it as in a completely stock car with R compounds.
But correct me if i'm wrong, a wing and wheels would throw you out of STOCK class right?
But correct me if i'm wrong, a wing and wheels would throw you out of STOCK class right?
The wing + wheels is worth 25pts each so its a 50 pts car.
Still another 50pts to go..
KW V3
Bumpsteer kit
RollBar
Flywheel
AC removal
02-21-2006, 04:27 PM
#25
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by krazik,Feb 21 2006, 04:47 PM
Not trying to piss you off but you have a tendancy to post your opinons up disguised as fact and then when I call you on it you just claim its an opinon. 
You're a marketing guy, I know its how you're wired
You're a marketing guy, I know its how you're wired
Yea I am a marketing guy and its how I am wired (you guys need us anyways).
How else is a small privateer supposed to review or test parts?
I am providing as much data as I can generate, such as lap times and I belive I try to do a better job then most. I don't have a trailer or extra set of volks to do a back to back testing also.
If gofastlabs want to help me out, I would gladly run a side by side testing.
02-21-2006, 04:27 PM
#26
Registered User
Originally Posted by Asura,Feb 21 2006, 06:18 PM
Well of course. Its a MOD car because of the R-cpds so automatic bump right there. And being a non-rookie is another auto-bump.
The wing + wheels is worth 25pts each so its a 50 pts car.
Still another 50pts to go..
KW V3
Bumpsteer kit
RollBar
Flywheel
AC removal
The wing + wheels is worth 25pts each so its a 50 pts car.
Still another 50pts to go..
KW V3
Bumpsteer kit
RollBar
Flywheel
AC removal
Since it's not in either of those boxes, I just wanted to correct it because the word stock gets thrown around when its not really stock. Like you said to krazik its a stock car, but basically any car that isn't gutted is stock to him
02-21-2006, 04:33 PM
#28
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by krazik,Feb 21 2006, 05:13 PM
I'm not here to point out I'm better, I'm just disagreeing with your review of the RA1s.
A lot of reviews are subjective: tires, suspension, handling, cars...
Do you guys want me to insert: "I think", "I belive", "Its my guess", "It feels" on every single review sentences?
02-21-2006, 04:41 PM
#29
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-21-2006, 04:46 PM
#30
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pantyraider,Feb 21 2006, 05:01 PM
So Rob, this is with 245's all around?
Why not try to get 265's in the back?
Why not try to get 265's in the back?
I didn't go 265 as I wanted to keep my fenders stock F & R. Does this mean my car is stock?!
