Mugen Lip Fuctionality
Before I owned my S2000 I wanted to get this lip purely for how it looked. Of course now that I own the car and autox/track it, I don't exactly want to just throw it on if it doesn't do anything.
My hopeful thinking is that since it adds some meat to the bottom of the bumper, it'll help keep out air and produce a little bit of negative lift, nowhere near a splitter, but at least a little.
Anyone own these and notice a difference in performance?
Im also thinking about adding some canards along with the lip, but overall, it might be easier to just get a splitter, what do you guys think?
(I'm also pairing with a CR wing soon so hopefully that doesnt upset the balance, I've read that the CR wing reduces rear lift as opposed to lots of downforce)
I'm not building this car to a competitive level btw, I just want to build a nicely balanced car and I compete to work on my driver mod :P
Last edited by DelinquentDJ; Jan 3, 2021 at 12:58 PM.
I am curious about how more rear downforce can give a splitter a greater effect. Wouldnt excessive rear downforce lift the front, which in turn reduce a splitter's effectiveness or am I missing the point entirely?
if your going with a cr wing, add a cr lip. honda designed them to work together and i can assure you they spent more time engineering a balanced package than the average joe is capable of recreating. can you do better with splitters and wings, oh absolutely. but if you want the mild aero/ oem look its hard to beat that cr package
per honda directly regarding the cr aero: Coefficient of Lift (Cl) Decreased by 70 to 80 Percent Overall
can you do better with a aftermarket wing and splitter, absolutely, but the cr aero package is both functional and well balanced.
https://hondanews.com/en-US/releases...0-introduction
A bit excessive, I treat my S as a do-it-all car including daily driving.
I am curious about how more rear downforce can give a splitter a greater effect. Wouldnt excessive rear downforce lift the front, which in turn reduce a splitter's effectiveness or am I missing the point entirely?
I am curious about how more rear downforce can give a splitter a greater effect. Wouldnt excessive rear downforce lift the front, which in turn reduce a splitter's effectiveness or am I missing the point entirely?
For our cars it's recommended to add the rear wing FIRST since the downforce on the rear at higher speeds can be effective without a effective front splitter.
I'm no aerodynamic engineer so I won't pretend to know exactly how to works but from my basic understanding
Adding the front splitter without the wing causes the front to dive more and you don't have the downforce on the rear to help effectively making your rear end less stable at speed.
Trending Topics
i will wholeheartedly disagree with that statement. the cr aero package is very much a functional and very well balanced aero package at that.
per honda directly regarding the cr aero: Coefficient of Lift (Cl) Decreased by 70 to 80 Percent Overall
can you do better with a aftermarket wing and splitter, absolutely, but the cr aero package is both functional and well balanced.
https://hondanews.com/en-US/releases...0-introduction
per honda directly regarding the cr aero: Coefficient of Lift (Cl) Decreased by 70 to 80 Percent Overall
can you do better with a aftermarket wing and splitter, absolutely, but the cr aero package is both functional and well balanced.
https://hondanews.com/en-US/releases...0-introduction
You would also be surprised how little work OEMs do on these aero packages, especially on a car with the S2000s budget.
I'm rules limited to the CR wing/ front lip, so no splitter or non oe wing. Would the CR lip still be functional over nothing?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jae2K
S2000 Under The Hood
0
Feb 12, 2019 08:59 PM
reversible
S2000 Talk
2
Dec 26, 2018 05:49 AM









