S2000 to be classed in new ITR class (tentative)
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 366
From: Redondo Beach
More tidbits:
Only the S2000 and the 968 are estimated to gain just 15% power; all others are 20-30%, except the 328 at 33%.
Averages:
Stock power: 207
IT power: 260 (25% gain)
IT weight: 2910
IT pwr/wt: 11.2
Seems pretty fair; the S should be very competitive in that field.
Only the S2000 and the 968 are estimated to gain just 15% power; all others are 20-30%, except the 328 at 33%.
Averages:
Stock power: 207
IT power: 260 (25% gain)
IT weight: 2910
IT pwr/wt: 11.2
Seems pretty fair; the S should be very competitive in that field.
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Originally Posted by jlucas,Jun 21 2006, 03:37 AM
This is not realistic unless you are changing everything into a body shell only and they add an update/backdate rule (which is not on the table for ITR). All the electrical is different in 06. DBW, fuse & junctions boxes, cam bus communiction, cabin harness, engine harness, etc.... It was already investigated heavily for the pre 06 cars running in T2 that really need to be able to edit the stock ECU (legal in T2).
can the s2k be allowed to use any ecu?
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Originally Posted by payneinthe,Jun 21 2006, 08:58 AM
Is that weight w/ or w/o driver? If it's with, I wouldn't have any trouble making weight 
*ducks*
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Ph-Ph-Ph-Phoenix
To save others from doing the math, if the RSX-S were to be 2665 it would put the pwr/wt at 10.66 (2 hundreths under the ITR).
*Edit, my fat fingers caused me to type 11 instead of 10.66
*Edit, my fat fingers caused me to type 11 instead of 10.66
