S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Square setup without rear wing

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 19, 2013 | 09:31 AM
  #11  
Driven's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 45
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Sebring AP1
Originally Posted by Driven' timestamp='1371655614' post='22618000
I have a non-staggered, no aero car.

It's on eibach springs, oem shocks, front eibach bar, AP2.

I tend to swap cars out with people at autocrosses and track days. Everyone says the car is very neutral, although it takes a bit to trust how much grip there is. It doesn't step out too unpredictably. A lot of that is in the alignment. I started with the Euro alignment, did max caster and a wee bit more camber. The alignment and non-staggered really changed the way the car handles.

I'm finally looking into doing aero, so may have to relearn the car.

No relearning. Putting the aero on is like learning how to ride a tricycle after you've learned on a standard 2 wheel bike. It just gets easier.
Do wings require/benefit from alignment changes?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2013 | 09:34 AM
  #12  
Sebring AP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 2
From: FV CA
Default

Originally Posted by Driven
Originally Posted by Sebring AP1' timestamp='1371656174' post='22618029
[quote name='Driven' timestamp='1371655614' post='22618000']
I have a non-staggered, no aero car.

It's on eibach springs, oem shocks, front eibach bar, AP2.

I tend to swap cars out with people at autocrosses and track days. Everyone says the car is very neutral, although it takes a bit to trust how much grip there is. It doesn't step out too unpredictably. A lot of that is in the alignment. I started with the Euro alignment, did max caster and a wee bit more camber. The alignment and non-staggered really changed the way the car handles.

I'm finally looking into doing aero, so may have to relearn the car.

No relearning. Putting the aero on is like learning how to ride a tricycle after you've learned on a standard 2 wheel bike. It just gets easier.
Do wings require/benefit from alignment changes?
[/quote]

I wouldn't know since I don't run them, but personally I would think so. This is where trusty Mr. Pyrometer helps tons
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2013 | 10:35 AM
  #13  
odb812's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 6
Default

I think you should go with a bigger, adjustable front swaybar. It really helps to have something adjustable, other than alignment, to help you balance things out and it also sounds like you're pretty happy with your current shocks and springs.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2013 | 10:52 AM
  #14  
//steve\\'s Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,465
Likes: 52
From: ATL
Default

I think a lot of the guys running a rear wing back off the rear camber a tad from what I've seen.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2013 | 11:10 AM
  #15  
adrs2k's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 9,572
Likes: 197
From: Philly Burbs
Default

Originally Posted by //steve\\
I think a lot of the guys running a rear wing back off the rear camber a tad from what I've seen.
With my CR rear wing and Hankook RS-3's I am currently at -2.8 rear camber and have excessive wear on the outer shoulders of my tires. Next alignment I am moving to -3.0.

I know...the CR wing is not a "real wing" lol
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2013 | 11:12 AM
  #16  
GT Motoring's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 16,133
Likes: 2
From: Chicago Burbs
Default

Originally Posted by adrs2k
Originally Posted by //steve\\' timestamp='1371667973' post='22618609
I think a lot of the guys running a rear wing back off the rear camber a tad from what I've seen.
With my CR rear wing and Hankook RS-3's I am currently at -2.8 rear camber and have excessive wear on the outer shoulders of my tires. Next alignment I am moving to -3.0.

I know...the CR wing is not a "real wing" lol
This seems to be more of an RS-3 issue than an overall alignment issue. Those tires LOVE camber.

That being said, I'm running -3 rear camber with a Voltex Type 1 and the car handles very neutrally with -3.4 camber up front and no front aero.

edit - generally I leave camber alone if the pyrometer says its ok, but I tend to pull some rear toe out of the car.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2013 | 11:53 AM
  #17  
psychoazn's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,223
Likes: 4
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Driven
Originally Posted by Sebring AP1' timestamp='1371656174' post='22618029
[quote name='Driven' timestamp='1371655614' post='22618000']
I have a non-staggered, no aero car.

It's on eibach springs, oem shocks, front eibach bar, AP2.

I tend to swap cars out with people at autocrosses and track days. Everyone says the car is very neutral, although it takes a bit to trust how much grip there is. It doesn't step out too unpredictably. A lot of that is in the alignment. I started with the Euro alignment, did max caster and a wee bit more camber. The alignment and non-staggered really changed the way the car handles.

I'm finally looking into doing aero, so may have to relearn the car.

No relearning. Putting the aero on is like learning how to ride a tricycle after you've learned on a standard 2 wheel bike. It just gets easier.
Do wings require/benefit from alignment changes?
[/quote]

Require? No. Benefit? Yes. You won't see as much roll with a wing
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2013 | 11:55 AM
  #18  
//steve\\'s Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,465
Likes: 52
From: ATL
Default

^yeah, The RS3 likes more camber than most tires and you're running a 255 on a 8.5 which isn't helping either. I'd bet on a 9.5" wheel you wouldn't quite see the same wear. I know when I had RS3s on my last one I was pretty close to OK out back with -3.2 but the fronts at -2.8 were getting noticeable outside wear. That was on 17x9 rpf1s.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2013 | 11:57 AM
  #19  
billios996's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 8
From: Easton, PA
Default

If you are not running in a class that limits wheel size, why run square setup? Aside from the practical benefits (tire rotation, fitment, etc), what is the performance gain? It seems like you need to screw around with the anti-sway bars just to get you back where you started stock.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2013 | 12:00 PM
  #20  
GT Motoring's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 16,133
Likes: 2
From: Chicago Burbs
Default

Originally Posted by billios996
If you are not running in a class that limits wheel size, why run square setup? Aside from the practical benefits (tire rotation, fitment, etc), what is the performance gain? It seems like you need to screw around with the anti-sway bars just to get you back where you started stock.
The additional grip up front lets you enter a corner faster and carry more speed through the corner, which usually translates to more corner exit speed and faster lap times overall.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:13 AM.