S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

STR Prep - Suspension and Alignment

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-28-2012, 09:32 AM
  #101  

Thread Starter
 
Random1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mLeach
So here's the problem with that method that someone else pointed out. The entire hub assembly moves toward the body during compression/bump/vertical deflection because of the camber curve. you would need to plot that arc against that curve and measure the delta to understand what that distance means. luckily, that arc can be drawn geometrically because of the drawings available of the suspension pickups.

This is why I suggested pointing two downward to generate a line that describes the angle of the hub relative to your alignment at normal ride height.
I must have missed the comment on pointing the laser down. I would also think that having the laser attached to something that represents the radius of the wheel/tire would also be useful while pointing down. I'll think about that today and see if I can try it. The car is still apart in the garage.
Old 01-28-2012, 09:52 AM
  #102  
Registered User
 
mLeach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Random1
Originally Posted by mLeach' timestamp='1327770155' post='21361061
So here's the problem with that method that someone else pointed out. The entire hub assembly moves toward the body during compression/bump/vertical deflection because of the camber curve. you would need to plot that arc against that curve and measure the delta to understand what that distance means. luckily, that arc can be drawn geometrically because of the drawings available of the suspension pickups.

This is why I suggested pointing two downward to generate a line that describes the angle of the hub relative to your alignment at normal ride height.
I must have missed the comment on pointing the laser down. I would also think that having the laser attached to something that represents the radius of the wheel/tire would also be useful while pointing down. I'll think about that today and see if I can try it. The car is still apart in the garage.
you need two lasers to draw the line between those dots, or you need to do two plots, one with a laser mounted forward of the centerline, and one mounted rear of the centerline. OR!!!!! you could get one of those picture level things and mount it to the face of the hub! You know, the ones that spin and send a line around the room. mount it so that it draws the line that is parallel to the face of the hub, and draw that line on a peice of paper on the ground. All you care about is the change in angle.

hot damn, that could be the trick.
Old 01-28-2012, 10:45 AM
  #103  

 
IntegraR0064's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Near Philadelphia
Posts: 1,881
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mLeach
Originally Posted by Random1' timestamp='1327775531' post='21361239
[quote name='mLeach' timestamp='1327770155' post='21361061']
So here's the problem with that method that someone else pointed out. The entire hub assembly moves toward the body during compression/bump/vertical deflection because of the camber curve. you would need to plot that arc against that curve and measure the delta to understand what that distance means. luckily, that arc can be drawn geometrically because of the drawings available of the suspension pickups.

This is why I suggested pointing two downward to generate a line that describes the angle of the hub relative to your alignment at normal ride height.
I must have missed the comment on pointing the laser down. I would also think that having the laser attached to something that represents the radius of the wheel/tire would also be useful while pointing down. I'll think about that today and see if I can try it. The car is still apart in the garage.
you need two lasers to draw the line between those dots, or you need to do two plots, one with a laser mounted forward of the centerline, and one mounted rear of the centerline. OR!!!!! you could get one of those picture level things and mount it to the face of the hub! You know, the ones that spin and send a line around the room. mount it so that it draws the line that is parallel to the face of the hub, and draw that line on a peice of paper on the ground. All you care about is the change in angle.

hot damn, that could be the trick.
[/quote]]

2 lasers is a good idea, but I think it'd be better to mount them perpendicular to the hub (I was thinking taping two laser pointers with the rear against the rotor and front at the hub pointing out) so the lasers point to the side of the car. Put one on the front and one on the rear. Then you could put a vertical surface (like a wall) 10 or 12 ft away so the displacement of the laser is magnified.

If you could find a way to mount one of those spinning lasers that'd be even better.
Old 01-28-2012, 11:20 AM
  #104  

Thread Starter
 
Random1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Funny, I was just at a friends house (MR-2 STR driver) telling about this and he pulled out a spinning laser that makes a straight line. He said point this at the ground and measure the change in angle, so I borrowed it. When I get home later I'll give it a try.
Old 01-30-2012, 04:18 AM
  #105  

Thread Starter
 
Random1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Random1
Funny, I was just at a friends house (MR-2 STR driver) telling about this and he pulled out a spinning laser that makes a straight line. He said point this at the ground and measure the change in angle, so I borrowed it. When I get home later I'll give it a try.
The spinning laser did not work well either. I tried it both pointing at the ground perpendicular to the hub and also pointing at the wall straight out from the hub with a vertical line. There was still lateral movement of the line with some angle change. I'll post these when I get a chance.

I then removed the second shock and took a bunch of measurements with toe plates at varying ride heights. Once I get the data sorted/plotted I will post. It definitely showed toeing out (still total toe in measured) while compressing up to roughly a 15" ride height then it started toeing inward. At 16.25" it was 0.5". It was almost down to 1/8" at 15". At 12.5" toe was 3/8". This clearly shows a toe out motion followed by a toe in motion. So, if you operate at less than a 15" ride height over the entire compression/rebound stroke then it will be toe in only on compression and toe out only on rebound. The next question is if that curve is linear or otherwise. I may have to take more data to figure that part out.

If you are going to characterize the rear toe curve I recommend doing a measurement every 0.5" of motion.
Old 01-30-2012, 06:01 AM
  #106  
Registered User
 
mLeach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rob, can you expand your explanation of the ride height measurements? Most of the STR guys have stated ride heights from center of the hub to the fender lip, and these are usually in the 12 - 13" range at rest.

You have measurements at 15" and I just wanted to see if these were applicable.

Also, thanks for looking into all of this!
Old 01-31-2012, 05:11 PM
  #107  

Thread Starter
 
Random1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Finally got around to this...

Method for Measuring Rear Toe Curve
  1. Removed rear wheels
  2. Removed both shocks
  3. Disconnected sway bar
  4. Loosened upper a-arm pivot bolts to allow more droop (over come rubber flex limitation)
  5. Installed wheels
  6. Placed folded plastic garbage bags under wheels
  7. Used two low profile aluminum racing jacks, one on each side to control ride height
  8. Started at highest ride height with tire tread touching and parallel to ground
  9. Set and measured ride height at various ride heights from bottom of 949 wheel to metal fender edge and subtracted 9.25" (radius). Double check both sides because changing height on one side affects the other (iterative).
  10. Measured toe using toe plates
  11. Repeated measurements to confirm
  12. Reassembled car
  13. Plotted data using Excel





Observations
  1. Toe out movement occurs under compression until about a 15" ride height, the remainder of the compression stroke experiences toe in
  2. The minimum toe was at a ride height of about 15"
  3. The suspension travel range used for most STR setups will only encounter toe-in during compression (no toe out)
  4. The lowest ride height achieved during this exercise was 11.0 inches due to the minimum jack height
  5. Repeated measurements varied from 1/16" to 1/8"
  6. Recommend others repeat this to see if data collected is reasonably consistent
  7. Recommend making toe measurements at ride height increments of 0.5" to better define the curve.
Old 01-31-2012, 05:21 PM
  #108  
Registered User

 
nlink720's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Would anyone be so kind as to share their compression and rebound settings for the newer Moton Clubsports that have 15 rebound / 11 compression?

I am new to DA shocks, and with 850/700 springs the car is bouncy with compression at 4/11 (11 being stiffest) and rebound at anything less than 6/15.

I understand rebound well, and expect that I will need a lot to control the high spring rates, but compression tuning is new to me and I am looking to know what people use since I cannot follow the only guidelines I found (by Koni for their DA's) until I get a chance to find a test and tune. And since compression is seemingly supposed to be set first, I am in the woods still with rebound, which is to be set subsequent to compression.


Thanks for assistance with te relatively novice question. (especially compared to the recent discussion)
Old 01-31-2012, 05:30 PM
  #109  
Registered User

 
josh7owens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Frankfort, KY
Posts: 4,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So the 12.5" ride height has a nice linear compression and rebound toe change.
Old 01-31-2012, 05:32 PM
  #110  
762
Registered User

 
762's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

car being "bouncy" seems more like rebound to me then compression.


Quick Reply: STR Prep - Suspension and Alignment



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:48 AM.