S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

UOA without baffle vs with baffle

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-22-2017, 12:00 PM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
bgoetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,730
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
Default UOA without baffle vs with baffle

Over the winter I installed a Ballad baffle plate and sent my first sample off to get tested. I figured everyone would be interested in the results, at least based on the first result the installation of the baffle plate seems to be a good thing! My guess is that the increase in silicon is due to the installation of the pan and possibly some extra Hondabond
Attached Thumbnails UOA without baffle vs with baffle-img_2567.png  

Last edited by bgoetz; 08-22-2017 at 12:03 PM.
Old 08-22-2017, 12:07 PM
  #2  

 
snitm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 528
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

5W/50 !!??
Old 08-22-2017, 12:29 PM
  #3  

 
zeroptzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 25,358
Received 3,361 Likes on 2,444 Posts
Default

Thanks for posting that is great info, and yes Hondabond will increase silicon content, the labs can't distinguish between dirt silicon or chemical silicon. The only other thing would be an air intake leak but not likely as you would have likely found it. Thanks for the info.
Old 08-22-2017, 12:46 PM
  #4  

Thread Starter
 
bgoetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,730
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by snitm
5W/50 !!??
Yeah the person commenting wasn't having a good day, he thought I was driving a Mazda too. I had 5w/40 Joe Gibbs. Same exact oil as the prior sample.
Old 08-22-2017, 02:26 PM
  #5  

 
ndogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I'm not super into oil analysis, but which number(s) make you think that the baffle is helping? Most of the numbers seem the same or worse.
Old 08-22-2017, 02:51 PM
  #6  

Thread Starter
 
bgoetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,730
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ndogg
I'm not super into oil analysis, but which number(s) make you think that the baffle is helping? Most of the numbers seem the same or worse.
Mainly the lead. The aluminum is a bit higher but my guess is that was from the pan itself being a freshly machined piece of aluminum.
Old 08-22-2017, 02:57 PM
  #7  

 
DanielB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 556
Received 75 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

So is the thinking that there is occasional brief oil starvation (or at least some drop in pressure) that occasionally happens without a baffled oil pan which causes small but incremental wear of the bearings? And the baffling reduces this so hence there is less lead in the oil?
Old 08-22-2017, 05:41 PM
  #8  

Thread Starter
 
bgoetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,730
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Yes, again this is just one sample, but the only change was the baffle. My lead wasn't super high before, but it was elevated. Admittedly it was trending downwards. So who really knows. One thing I do know is that the one sample on there had high lead, aluminum, and shearing. It was right after one of that hardest tracks on a car IMO.
Old 08-28-2017, 09:47 AM
  #9  

 
scottdh20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: west michigan
Posts: 471
Received 34 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

i have hasd that baffle sitting here for waaaay to long. one of these days i'll get around to installing it. hahaha
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rednikos
UK & Ireland For Sale and Wanted
9
03-01-2016 04:52 AM
s2konroids
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
6
08-26-2013 04:15 AM
Reapur
Southern Ontario S2000 Owners
63
01-10-2013 10:07 AM
david.mt
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
13
06-25-2011 12:01 AM



Quick Reply: UOA without baffle vs with baffle



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:25 AM.