S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

Comptech SCed S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 4, 2001 | 11:05 AM
  #11  
Visitor's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: 20 miles from Miami.
Default

Ooops! Just realized Wesmaster answered my question.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2001 | 02:46 PM
  #12  
Bassmaster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: Durham
Default

Wes looks like you easily pulled on him.

I was looking back a the Cinco de mayo pictures of the cars dynoed...I saw your car among the miata...pretty cool.

I had thought about going...but just a little too far.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2001 | 05:55 AM
  #13  
Wesmaster's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,765
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Originally posted by Bassmaster
Wes looks like you easily pulled on him.

I was looking back a the Cinco de mayo pictures of the cars dynoed...I saw your car among the miata...pretty cool.

I had thought about going...but just a little too far.
Yeah, I just discovered that picture/site a few days ago, I decided to search to see if anyone had posted pics and sure enough!

One thing interesting SCC said about the Comptech car was that from 15-100MPH it was 3 seconds faster than stock...so obviously - they just had problems launching the car.

The Nuespeed car is in the magazine too, both cars got great reviews.

Wesmaster
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2001 | 07:33 AM
  #14  
ultimate lurker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 1
From: You wish
Default

Yeah, kind of funny, isn't it Wes? A 3 second improvement in that speed range ought to equate to at least a 1 second improvement in quarter mile time.

What I find interesting too is that their stock 15-100 time is a bit slow. C&D, among the slower of the magazine testers, did 0-100 in 14.8 seconds. Their 5-60 time was 1 second slower than 0-60, so 5-100 should have taken about 15.8 seconds. So why does SCC need 15.7 to do 15-100? Ought to be closer to 14.7 I think. Maybe they were testing at altitude?

Nonetheless, with R&T taking 13 seconds to do 20-100 while running 14.1@99.6 in a stock S2k, SCC's quarter ETs are just plain slow. In fact, R&T did 0-20 in 1.2 seconds. So if we're pessimistic, that would mean that SCC, with a good launch, should have been able to do 0-100 in under 13 seconds. Hmm, that's still a good 1 or more seconds behind the 0-100 times of cars like the 360 Spider, Z8 and Z06 (12, 11 and 10 seconds respectively). Now, that raises some flags on Comptech's side of the fence. Because an S2K with 340 hp ought to be pretty darn close in roll-ons to 100 with a Modena (50 hp more, but 600-700 lbs more. Perhaps another indication that they tested at altitude?

If not, maybe the Comptech cars don't perform quite as well as the dyno plots would indicate. Maybe its torque curve (i.e., lack thereof) or maybe its heat soak. Interesting.

UL
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2001 | 10:02 PM
  #15  
SS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: pittstown
Default

my SC S2k ran a 13.4@107 but my clutch was slipping for about 1/2 a sec each time i shifted, so i know i can go faster(i got the comptech exhaust also) and it seems to be running rich
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2001 | 10:48 PM
  #16  
Bassmaster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: Durham
Default

Great run...That 107 mph shows a huge increase in power over the one tested!....Id like to see the whole time slip if available thanks.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
faster
S2000 Forced Induction
16
Nov 15, 2005 08:23 PM
Silver S2k4
S2000 Forced Induction
2
Jul 15, 2005 04:36 AM
dolfandrus
S2000 Talk
33
Jun 28, 2004 11:01 AM
pancho
S2000 Talk
13
Jan 2, 2001 10:58 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:46 PM.