Ran a Trans-Am...
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
"Most LS1's have almost 400 TQ @ the Crank..."
No, As I said before, they have 350 tq to the crank, untiul 2001 the corvette C5 gets 375 tq on the LS1. Now the LS6 on the other hand, does make 400 tq at the crank, and 405 hp.
A turbo S2k should be able to take a stock LS1 camaro/trans am, and possibly the corvette. BUT, it does not take much at all to gte massive power out of them, no F1 needed, just bolt ons to take a Turbo S2k. Now on the track is another story. Unless its a vette.
No, As I said before, they have 350 tq to the crank, untiul 2001 the corvette C5 gets 375 tq on the LS1. Now the LS6 on the other hand, does make 400 tq at the crank, and 405 hp.
A turbo S2k should be able to take a stock LS1 camaro/trans am, and possibly the corvette. BUT, it does not take much at all to gte massive power out of them, no F1 needed, just bolt ons to take a Turbo S2k. Now on the track is another story. Unless its a vette.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally posted by JsnS2k
I believe the J-Body is the cavalier, and such. I could be wrong.
Why is it called the F-Body? Good question.
I believe the J-Body is the cavalier, and such. I could be wrong.
Why is it called the F-Body? Good question.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
[QUOTE]Originally posted by JsnS2k
[B]"Most LS1's have almost 400 TQ @ the Crank..."
No, As I said before, they have 350 tq to the crank, untiul 2001 the corvette C5 gets 375 tq on the LS1. Now the LS6 on the other hand, does make 400 tq at the crank, and 405 hp.
A turbo S2k should be able to take
[B]"Most LS1's have almost 400 TQ @ the Crank..."
No, As I said before, they have 350 tq to the crank, untiul 2001 the corvette C5 gets 375 tq on the LS1. Now the LS6 on the other hand, does make 400 tq at the crank, and 405 hp.
A turbo S2k should be able to take
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
[QUOTE]Originally posted by CrazyBosnian
[B]
Hehe, you are what we call a magazine racer...Let me get some facts straight for ya...Corvette and the F-bodys (LS1s) dyno about the same, usually the corvette being the one dynoing lower due to the IRS.
[B]
Hehe, you are what we call a magazine racer...Let me get some facts straight for ya...Corvette and the F-bodys (LS1s) dyno about the same, usually the corvette being the one dynoing lower due to the IRS.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,425
Likes: 0
From: Kirkland
purdy,
are you that funny looking dark brown kid with the greasy lookin overly done up hair in a black s2000 that i saw cruisin' through alki a couple of weeks ago?
i was in the silver ride and nodded at u.
are you that funny looking dark brown kid with the greasy lookin overly done up hair in a black s2000 that i saw cruisin' through alki a couple of weeks ago?
i was in the silver ride and nodded at u.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
Ok, A different way of saying one thing I said before, about the vette having more hp to the crank then the F-bodys. I wanted to point out that it is not just that the camaro and trans am are underrated, as I did say before and you did not see.......... But the LS1 in the F-body is slightly detuned, which is why you see a bit more power from simple bolt on modifications, like I/H/E then you would see on a vette.
And again, no LS1 makes 400 TQ stock. That would be the LS6.
And again, no LS1 makes 400 TQ stock. That would be the LS6.
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Alki Beach
[QUOTE]Originally posted by WRS2K
[B]purdy,
are you that funny looking dark brown kid with the greasy lookin overly done up hair in a black s2000 that i saw cruisin' through alki a couple of weeks ago?
[B]purdy,
are you that funny looking dark brown kid with the greasy lookin overly done up hair in a black s2000 that i saw cruisin' through alki a couple of weeks ago?