S2 vs 300ZX TT
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Z06-KILLR,Mar 3 2006, 01:23 AM
A stage III TT would smoke the doors out of a stock S2K...driver or no driver...lol
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,418
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by vtec9,Feb 16 2006, 12:31 PM
word.
stock 300zx TT back in whatever year it was made was capable of low 5 to 60 (5.2), high 13s in the quarter so I hear, which gives it a slight advantage over most S drivers.
Only car I have experience with is a non turbo model, which was a boat.. a very slow boat.
stock 300zx TT back in whatever year it was made was capable of low 5 to 60 (5.2), high 13s in the quarter so I hear, which gives it a slight advantage over most S drivers.
Only car I have experience with is a non turbo model, which was a boat.. a very slow boat.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,418
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by 95rtturbo,Feb 28 2006, 03:11 AM
Yes, 170MPH can most definitely be done with minimal modifications (ECU, exhaust, downpipe, intake, etc), because the ECU includes boost jets that raise the boost, increasing the power output of the engine. 330-350RWHP is common with just these modifications at 15psi. I was arguing that a 100% completely stock 300ZX TT, with the limiter removed (no increase in boost), could not hit 170 (I believe the stock limiter is set at 153). My guess would be more along the lines of 160MPH (which is a big difference from 170MPH).
By the way, does anyone in the Saint Louis area with an S2K want to do some friendly runs (with my mostly stock Z)? Should be a close race.
By the way, does anyone in the Saint Louis area with an S2K want to do some friendly runs (with my mostly stock Z)? Should be a close race.
your almost a stage II if not a stage II, intake and exhaust do wonder for turbos compared to n/a.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post