s2 vs slighly modded srt-4
07-09-2006, 02:34 PM
#51
Community Organizer
Originally Posted by fusionchickenleg,Jul 5 2006, 10:04 PM
that are faster and better performers than the s2k.....
An EVO or STi would probably beat a S2000 in overall performance, if we are talking econobox performance. An SRT-4, from the factory, does nothing more than accelerate in a straight-line quickly. With money, of course, that can be changed....
07-09-2006, 02:41 PM
#52
Originally Posted by FearlessFife,Jul 9 2006, 02:34 PM
An EVO or STi would probably beat a S2000 in overall performance, if we are talking econobox performance.
07-09-2006, 03:46 PM
#56
Community Organizer
Originally Posted by killerbee_vr6,Jul 9 2006, 04:41 PM
That's a cute backhanded compliment.
I have a lot of respect for the STi and EVO both (I have one friend who has an STi, and another who has an EVO), and I would love to have one or the other in my garage....however, the truth is they are a much faster version of an economy car.....and Mitsu and Subaru did a much better job and making an economy car very performance oriented than Dodge did with the Neon.
07-09-2006, 04:57 PM
#60
Originally Posted by FearlessFife,Jul 9 2006, 04:46 PM
Mitsu and Subaru did a much better job and making an economy car very performance oriented than Dodge did with the Neon.
