SC S2K VS 03 lightning
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Cuyahoga Falls
You should have taken him pretty easy if your car is running right and he was stock.
__________________
2003 Lightning # 627 - 13.582@102.27
1996 Camaro Z28 11.7's@116...years ago...soon 10's
1999 Mustang V6 15.3's@91
1996 Camaro Z28 1999 Mustang V6 2003 Lightning
__________________
2003 Lightning # 627 - 13.582@102.27
1996 Camaro Z28 11.7's@116...years ago...soon 10's
1999 Mustang V6 15.3's@91
1996 Camaro Z28 1999 Mustang V6 2003 Lightning
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
From: leavenworth
Originally posted by under-rated
Lightning is S/C from the factory right? At the end of your post you said he was stock! WTF, you should have destroyed him, Z06-KILLR is a 13.2 you were dead even with the STI. A truck?
Lightning is S/C from the factory right? At the end of your post you said he was stock! WTF, you should have destroyed him, Z06-KILLR is a 13.2 you were dead even with the STI. A truck?
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
From: leavenworth
Our cars with a supercharger with a very good driver is still a low to mid 13's car. I don't know why everyone thinks they are that fast. On a roll is a different matter all together, probably hang with a car that runs in the high 12's.
Pedal to the metal, be safe!!!
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
I used to own a 2001 lightning (look at my pro), I only had two mods, 6lb. pulley and a diablo chip. It would have smoked my s2k (mods: apexN1, aem cai). I ran an 8.29 in the 8th mile in my lightning. These are fast trucks!!