S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

0-60 ?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #41  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

[QUOTE=Ray S (Chicago),Apr 17 2005, 09:04 PM] Magazines do not use G-Tech's or even "the same type of device".
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 09:17 PM
  #42  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

[QUOTE=Ray S (Chicago),Apr 17 2005, 09:08 PM] Good answer....change the topic of the thread to a new one?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 09:20 PM
  #43  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

Originally Posted by Ray S (Chicago),Apr 17 2005, 09:51 PM
Excellent!! You're going to post a timeslip (1/4 mile I assume) to prove your assertion that a stock S2k can go 0-60 in 5.2 seconds? Yet you admit that it won't provide a 0-60 time (the whole purpose and title of this thread BTW)?

Wow, you've clearly proven me wrong!

Care to change the topic again???
Uh, NO TRACK IN THE WORLD gives you a 0-60 time. So no, his timeslip won't have a 0-60 time on it. Why? oh yeah, because 0-60 times are measured using acceleromters.

At this point I've already stated that I've had 5.3 on a properly calibrated accelerometer. It was run while at a track, so I had a timeslip to verify the accuracy of the acceleromter. I'm a moderator here, and long time member, so I would like to think my word probably counts for something.

If you aren't going to contribute to the thread, then I ask you refrain from responding further so we can get the thread back on track.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 09:31 PM
  #44  
YellowS2kPwr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,906
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,Apr 17 2005, 09:20 PM
Uh, NO TRACK IN THE WORLD gives you a 0-60 time. So no, his timeslip won't have a 0-60 time on it. Why? oh yeah, because 0-60 times are measured using acceleromters.

At this point I've already stated that I've had 5.3 on a properly calibrated accelerometer. It was run while at a track, so I had a timeslip to verify the accuracy of the acceleromter. I'm a moderator here, and long time member, so I would like to think my word probably counts for something.

If you aren't going to contribute to the thread, then I ask you refrain from responding further so we can get the thread back on track.
Thank you... Some people are just too much to deal with...
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #45  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

edited
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 09:36 PM
  #46  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

Originally Posted by Ray S (Chicago),Apr 17 2005, 09:08 PM
Good answer....change the topic of the thread to a new one? I guess you're still searching for a "5.2 source"?
Yup. 5.2 kids. Read it and weep. Time obtained from Motor Trend, February 2000.

http://www.car-stats.com/stats/showstats/s...atsgivenid.aspx


There's your "reliable" 5.2 source, since obviously you don't trust anything except a magazine. Can the dissenters stop bickering now please and let the thread get back on track?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 11:14 PM
  #47  
vAnt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
From: WA?
Default

*applauds Wisconsin S2k*

Oh the link isn't working XD.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 11:54 PM
  #48  
YellowS2kPwr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,906
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by vAnt,Apr 17 2005, 11:14 PM
*applauds Wisconsin S2k*

Oh the link isn't working XD.
It doesn't let you link but you can manually find it...
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 12:27 AM
  #49  
B SweepeR B6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Default

wow, how good do you feel in SHOVING THAT IN THEIR STUPID FACES! two thumps up to you! i konw if it were me, i would have been enjoying that moment. No i am not saying it sarcasitcally either.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 12:29 AM
  #50  
B SweepeR B6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by YellowS2kPwr,Apr 17 2005, 04:08 PM
And yes, it is very possible to break your differential by downshifting "just driving down the road".
can you give me some details on this? i have kinda hit rev limiter in 2nd gear for some stupid ing reason this past week or so a lot on the freeway. Something i dont usually have occuring, is that going to affect nething? n i have downshifted quickly into a lower gear n going WOT, will that affect anything? affect the motor mounts? differential? anything at all? thanks.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:42 AM.