2004 - Pictures and comments
#26
Former Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Erock is da shizzle
Posts: 16,175
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since there is no full rear shot in this latest set of pics, I wanted to mention those squared off tail pipes.. it may not be an impossibility, as the new MDX has a very similar design.
Something to ponder till more pics show up
Something to ponder till more pics show up
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Intercontinental
Posts: 4,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Back-cracker
Can someone comment on the door (tweeters) looks like it gone and only be offered at the headrest??
Can someone comment on the door (tweeters) looks like it gone and only be offered at the headrest??
BTW, I love the front intake and the black/red seats & door panels. The front and rear lights look good too. I still think that the original S can hold its own against numerous other cars (even the new model) but the new S will have a far broader appeal and that's what makes money for the company. There are far more people who don't mind not having 9k RPM as a redline but that's ok because I'm not one of them. I didn't buy this car because it had great trunk space and I didn't buy it because it had the best fuel economy. Like I told the salesman during my test drive, "this car is purpose built and it was meant for one thing."
With that said, the new car looks great and should do well. But as a request to Honda, please don't water it down too much!
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think dropping the redline 1K rpm is that big of a deal. I can't imagine complaining about an 8K rpm redline...........we are spoiled. Is the 2005 model going to be different?