215 Whp Stock 04
03-14-2006, 02:07 PM
#21
Registered User
[QUOTE=124Spider,Mar 14 2006, 11:33 AM] Nonsense.
My absolutely stock '04 (well, it does have an aftermarket head unit, and DOT4 brake fluid) did 219 uncorrected, 210 corrected, on a dynojet dyno.
My absolutely stock '04 (well, it does have an aftermarket head unit, and DOT4 brake fluid) did 219 uncorrected, 210 corrected, on a dynojet dyno.
03-14-2006, 03:23 PM
#22
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Redmond, Washington, USA
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by YellowS2kPwr,Mar 14 2006, 03:07 PM
Right. Well at least 5 ap2s dynoed on my dyno day (was 91 degrees though). All of them got ~200 whp except one that got 204 (yes I dynoed about 5 hp higher than ap2s). I had 203 on my ap1 stock. The guy with the 204 hp ap2 had at least 3 mods (intake exhaust and test pipe I think). SO unless you can back that up with some numbers from the same dyno days under the same conditions, then don't talk about stuff you don't know. 
you back
you back
03-14-2006, 03:56 PM
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How is it not fact by now that on avg. ap2's dyno higher than ap1's? People still argue the fact.
While I wouldn't say ap2's are faster than ap1's, I would say that ap2's dyno higher than ap1's...
While I wouldn't say ap2's are faster than ap1's, I would say that ap2's dyno higher than ap1's...
03-14-2006, 04:14 PM
#24
Registered User
Originally Posted by 24s2k7,Mar 14 2006, 04:56 PM
How is it not fact by now that on avg. ap2's dyno higher than ap1's? People still argue the fact.
While I wouldn't say ap2's are faster than ap1's, I would say that ap2's dyno higher than ap1's...
While I wouldn't say ap2's are faster than ap1's, I would say that ap2's dyno higher than ap1's...
but it isn't any faster. remember that even though ap2's dyno higher they can only rev to 8k so you'll always have that to brag about!
03-14-2006, 04:21 PM
#25
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: las vegas
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ks320,Mar 13 2006, 03:22 PM
Question: Do dyno curves for all S2000s look that smooth?
I remember looking at some dynos before (mainly ITRs and MR2s) and they looked rather rough, but this one's like ... smooooth!!! Or maybe the image was blury/my eyes are blury ...
I remember looking at some dynos before (mainly ITRs and MR2s) and they looked rather rough, but this one's like ... smooooth!!! Or maybe the image was blury/my eyes are blury ...
LOL. nice numbers. sea level i suppose? lates dave
03-14-2006, 04:23 PM
#26
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: las vegas
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 124Spider,Mar 14 2006, 04:23 PM
It's always funny when people talk so knowingly about their dyno numbers, but neglect to correct for temperature, humidity and atmospheric pressure. That's what "corrected" means--normalized for those variables. If you think it's meaningless to talk about dyno results from different machines, it's even more meaningless to talk about uncorrected dyno results, which, unfortunately is what people (including you, apparently) seem to fixate on.
later dave
03-14-2006, 04:49 PM
#27
Registered User
Originally Posted by S2oooNvegas,Mar 14 2006, 07:21 PM
hahaa, no mine got ripped to shreds for looking exactly the same, these idiots claimed i sprayed... LOL. nice numbers. sea level i suppose? lates dave
LOL. nice numbers. sea level i suppose? lates daveand before you go saying "these idiots" remember this.... those "idiots" weren't arguing that humidity ADDS horsepower.
this guy knows his ap1 is slower, and wont admit it.
ap1=ap2 ap2=ap1
thats all man. these people on here will argue whatever point benefits their personal goals,,, which is... making themselves look good, or feel like they are better than everyone else. smile.gif later dave
way to come in and sh*t all over someone else's thread dave. this isn't street encounters.
03-14-2006, 05:31 PM
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: La Crescenta, CA
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vbeachboy,Mar 13 2006, 07:02 PM
that K&N drop in filter definitely can be good for 2-3whp gain.
03-14-2006, 05:35 PM
#29
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Santa Clara, California
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Steven2k,Mar 14 2006, 06:31 PM
2-3 WHP from a drop in filter? you gotta be kidding me. i suppose a cold air intake will shoot that number to 5-8 WHP?
03-14-2006, 06:18 PM
#30
Registered User
good numbers bro! if your sick of hearing about dyno crap, you can always hit the strip and see at what mph you're trapping at.
for example, i make 221rwhp(mustang dyno) and on a G-tech(the strip is closed still) i trapped 102 twice and 103 once. last summer with a stock car i trapped 100.8. then i dyno 197rwhp(mustang) later the week.
for example, i make 221rwhp(mustang dyno) and on a G-tech(the strip is closed still) i trapped 102 twice and 103 once. last summer with a stock car i trapped 100.8. then i dyno 197rwhp(mustang) later the week.