S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

350z v s2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 02:34 PM
  #21  
UNC04SuzukaBlue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: Cary, NC
Default

Well, if we were talking about which sports car to buy, the S or the Z coupe, then we'd have a close contest. But because we're talking about which roadster to buy, the S wins hands down.

Roadsters should be nimble and feel like a go cart when you have the top down. The Z roadster outweighs the S by several hundred pounds, particularly the touring and grand touring trim levels. I test drove the Z roadster and the S back-to-back, and the Z just feels heavier. Of course, it makes up for the added weight with more horsepower (287 vs. 240) and much more torque (274 @ 4800 vs. 162 @ 6500), but again, I prefer lightweight and nimble for a roadster.

Roadsters should also be gorgeous, and the Z falls short here (I like the looks of the coupe, though). Also, visibility in the Z with the top up blows ... hard.

However, as others have said, test drive one again (w/o the salesman, if possible) and see what you think. Also, if you are thinking about a model year 04+ S2000, you should test drive one of those as well, to see how you feel about the changes from pre-04.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 03:14 PM
  #22  
hpark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

Originally Posted by UNC04SuzukaBlue,Jan 20 2005, 03:34 PM
Well, if we were talking about which sports car to buy, the S or the Z coupe, then we'd have a close contest. But because we're talking about which roadster to buy, the S wins hands down.

Roadsters should be nimble and feel like a go cart when you have the top down. The Z roadster outweighs the S by several hundred pounds, particularly the touring and grand touring trim levels. I test drove the Z roadster and the S back-to-back, and the Z just feels heavier. Of course, it makes up for the added weight with more horsepower (287 vs. 240) and much more torque (274 @ 4800 vs. 162 @ 6500), but again, I prefer lightweight and nimble for a roadster.

Roadsters should also be gorgeous, and the Z falls short here (I like the looks of the coupe, though). Also, visibility in the Z with the top up blows ... hard.

However, as others have said, test drive one again (w/o the salesman, if possible) and see what you think. Also, if you are thinking about a model year 04+ S2000, you should test drive one of those as well, to see how you feel about the changes from pre-04.
i wouldn't even consider a 350z roadster a sports car...doesn't it way close to 1000 lbs (not several hundred) more than the S2000????

the S2000 should surely pummel the 350ZR in any measurable performance contest.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 03:19 PM
  #23  
cshama's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: nyc
Default

I will test the z one more time and then probably go with the s. My only reservation is that the rx8 is a high revver and so is the s2000. It gets a little old after a while if you know what I mean
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 03:30 PM
  #24  
Warpinoy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cshama,Jan 19 2005, 09:39 PM
I am looking for some advice. I currently have an rx-8 as my practical 4
door family car and am looking to complement it with a convertible.

I used to have a 2003 s2000 and truly loved the car. I sold it to get a
911. What a mistake! The 911 spent more time getting repaired then anything
else.

My 2 choices now are to get another s2000 or perhaps go for a 350z
roadster. I test drove the nissan but the salesman was babbling so much I
was unable to really test the car properly. Probably I will test it again.

I am looking for your opinions to help me decide! I am looking at the 2005
model year.
wow asking this on an S2000 board....joo iz funney

u will get biased answers.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 03:33 PM
  #25  
r_duff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 1
From: socal
Default

Originally Posted by cshama,Jan 20 2005, 04:19 PM
My only reservation is that the rx8 is a high revver and so is the s2000. It gets a little old after a while if you know what I mean
You need a flame for that comment!
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 03:34 PM
  #26  
str8 6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Default

can't go wrong with any of these cars to be honest with you. both are great cars although i think the convertible z doesn't look right.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 03:37 PM
  #27  
problem_child's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,128
Likes: 1
From: IM SEXY
Default

M3


... if not, S2000
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 03:39 PM
  #28  
Skimad57's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Mad River Valley, VT
Default

We went with the S after looking at almost everything.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 04:22 PM
  #29  
Planets's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Bend, OR
Default

[QUOTE=Warpinoy,Jan 20 2005, 04:30 PM] wow asking this on an S2000 board....joo iz
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 04:45 PM
  #30  
Skimad57's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Mad River Valley, VT
Default

Oh yeah and here's a Street Encounter hehehehehe

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=128927

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:35 AM.