S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

4.57 gear

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #21  
Emil St-Hilaire's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 22,661
Likes: 490
From: St-Redempteur,Qc.
Default

Originally Posted by admanirv123,Oct 17 2006, 04:31 PM
4.77 = no no for motorway driving, best for performance

4.57 = good for motorway and performance best of both worlds

4.44 = not that much of a performance increase.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 07:32 PM
  #22  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Originally Posted by SuperS2nv,Oct 16 2006, 01:58 PM
Hey guys. i just bought ricks 4.57 final gear drive and i was wondering how much difference it was going to make... top end and bottom?? will it kill my top end?
Shouldn't you have asked those questions before buying it??? That's a lot of money to spend w/o knowing what difference it will make!
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 03:43 AM
  #23  
S2000380's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: sicklerville
Default

Are 4.57 gears ok for an AP2? And also what do you guys think about J's or anyother LSD (1.5)?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 09:26 AM
  #24  
minboost2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: South LA/North OC
Default

I'll let you know how the gears are in an AP2. I'll be making some vids for youtube soon (my gear install in this saturday...4.57 in a stock AP2).
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 10:19 AM
  #25  
an2ny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Default

Ok can someone post the average times like 0-60 or
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 10:37 AM
  #26  
glagola1's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
Default

I drove a car with 4.77s and a whole host of goodies like light wheels, HP producing exhaust/headers (supposedly) around CMP and I could only equal the lap times I did in my stock except for Motons/mugen exhaust and comptech front sway bar car.

To say that 4.77s are faster is misleading and it's odd that this is hardly discussed here. On this track and I would wager on any auto-x course the car with a shorter gear will be at a disadvantage. Shorter gears mean more shifting. More shifting is less time accelerating. This adds up.

But, you will notice increased accelleration (and shifting) as you drive to the next stop light.

Have fun.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 01:01 PM
  #27  
minboost2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: South LA/North OC
Default

Originally Posted by glagola1,Oct 18 2006, 10:37 AM
To say that 4.77s are faster is misleading and it's odd that this is hardly discussed here. On this track and I would wager on any auto-x course the car with a shorter gear will be at a disadvantage. Shorter gears mean more shifting. More shifting is less time accelerating. This adds up.
I don't think shorter gears are a disadvantage on many tracks. Maybe the 4.77's are extreme, but with a 4.57 or 4.44 I don't know if you can say absolutely that it has a disadvantage against stock (and I won't be so bold as to say it provides an advantage either).

I will say that the accelleration is obviously much better with the shorter final gear. Watching videos online, it is obvious that the accelleration shows a big improvement.

Your personal experience is not really an indicator of anything. Maybe the suspension was poorly set up on the guys car you drove with the 4.77's. Maybe he his brakes were cooked, his tires overheated (or cold), etc etc. Lots of variables involved when you compare two completely different cars like that, then try to attribute the difference to 1 of the many differences between the two cars.

Anyway, my video will show the cluster from a 5mph roll to top of 3rd or into 4th. I will do this stock and then stock with 4.57s on my AP2. Then I will edit the video so that the clusters are side by side, and both start at the same time. This will clearly show the difference in accelleration.

It'll probably take me a month to get the video done. I have to shoot the stock video friday, install the gears sunday, break it in for a week or two, then shoot the final video, then edit it all together.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 01:23 PM
  #28  
pantyraider's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 1
From: San Fran
Default

Originally Posted by minboost2,Oct 18 2006, 02:01 PM
I don't think shorter gears are a disadvantage on many tracks. Maybe the 4.77's are extreme, but with a 4.57 or 4.44 I don't know if you can say absolutely that it has a disadvantage against stock (and I won't be so bold as to say it provides an advantage either).

I will say that the accelleration is obviously much better with the shorter final gear. Watching videos online, it is obvious that the accelleration shows a big improvement.

Your personal experience is not really an indicator of anything. Maybe the suspension was poorly set up on the guys car you drove with the 4.77's. Maybe he his brakes were cooked, his tires overheated (or cold), etc etc. Lots of variables involved when you compare two completely different cars like that, then try to attribute the difference to 1 of the many differences between the two cars.

Anyway, my video will show the cluster from a 5mph roll to top of 3rd or into 4th. I will do this stock and then stock with 4.57s on my AP2. Then I will edit the video so that the clusters are side by side, and both start at the same time. This will clearly show the difference in accelleration.

It'll probably take me a month to get the video done. I have to shoot the stock video friday, install the gears sunday, break it in for a week or two, then shoot the final video, then edit it all together.
No, he has a point even if the comparison isn't a double-blind scientific test. Gearing is highly track dependent (road course), but in general I think 4.77s lead to too much shifting, especially in tight tracks or auto-x.

Besides that, driving on the highway going 75 almost at VTEC would drive me nuts.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 03:10 PM
  #29  
minboost2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: South LA/North OC
Default

Originally Posted by pantyraider,Oct 18 2006, 01:23 PM
No, he has a point even if the comparison isn't a double-blind scientific test. Gearing is highly track dependent (road course), but in general I think 4.77s lead to too much shifting, especially in tight tracks or auto-x.
Actually, if you read his post, his argument was based on lap times, not his impression that it was actually the gearing that was the problem.

Here's his simplified argument:

1. I drove a super fixed up car with 4.77 gears around the track.
2. I drove my car, which is much less fixed up and has stock gears around the track.
3. The lap times were similar, so the 4.77 gears must be a disadvantage.

That doesn't make sense, which is what I was pointing out. If, for #3, he had said, "When I drove the super fixed up car with 4.77 gears, I felt that the gearing was wrong for the track, and led the car to be slower than if it would have had stock gearing." - then the argument would make sense.

The way he argued it, it doesn't make sense. Like I said, the similar lap times could've been a result of anything.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 04:13 PM
  #30  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Serious motorcycle racers bring a variety of gears to suit various tracks. What's optimal for one track may not work near as well as another.

Gears def. have a higher fun factor, b/c they shove you a little harder in the back of the seat and subjectively feel faster since you're going through the gears quicker. Offset against that is the additional time you're losing w/ more shifts.

A few years ago I experimented w/ shorter gearing on my Honda CRF250R. It's engine had similar characteristics to the S2000's: revvy, w/ not much torque. I figured the gearing was a slam dunk improvement. Took it off after one race, b/c I lost intra-gear flexibility and banged through them too quick.

That said, I've driven an S2k w/ 4.57's, and liked it. Not sure if I'll make that mod myself, but it's under consideration. I wouldn't go w/ 4.77's, though, as that would be a bit too much IMO.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
owenxguo
Want to Buy
0
Apr 30, 2006 01:25 AM
raymo19
S2000 Talk
21
Apr 21, 2006 02:28 PM
Fitzysdelsol
S2000 Under The Hood
12
Jan 9, 2006 01:17 PM
1Fast99Si
S2000 Under The Hood
10
Aug 18, 2003 05:43 PM
Alfredo
S2000 Under The Hood
11
May 6, 2003 01:08 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:38 PM.