S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

7500 mile service

Thread Tools
 
Old May 16, 2005 | 09:08 AM
  #11  
RyanS2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,May 14 2005, 06:02 PM
the reason you do not use synthetic before 10k, is because synthetic may not work properly/efficiently on our FRM cylinder walls. (they take much longer to wear-in/break-in than the rest of the engine) doubtful it would cause immediate damage, but can shorten the life of the engine.
Uh-oh. I didn't know that and switched to synthetic at 5000 miles just like I have with all my other engines, including the ones I have built myself. Why do these "FRM" cylinder walls need more break-in time?
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 09:13 AM
  #12  
Filthy Beast's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 39
From: Moselle MS
Default

That is what everybody on this board say's you dont switch out to syn to atleast

10k miles
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 09:52 AM
  #13  
TR-S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,May 14 2005, 04:02 PM
Also, changing your oil every 3000 miles is a waste of resources and your money. Even conventional oil can wait a good 5k. A decent synthetic can take you to 7500+.
Oil change interval should be determined by mileage and/or time. If your driving style is in severse conditions: mostly short trips of 5 miles or less, or dusty roads, or ... , then you should change your conventional oil at 3750 miles or 6 months whichever comes first.
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 09:53 AM
  #14  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

Originally Posted by RyanS2000,May 16 2005, 11:08 AM
Uh-oh. I didn't know that and switched to synthetic at 5000 miles just like I have with all my other engines, including the ones I have built myself. Why do these "FRM" cylinder walls need more break-in time?
the material simply takes longer to smooth out and break-in properly. 5k probably isn't detrimental. honda recommends 7500. most on the forums say 10k.
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 11:26 AM
  #15  
RyanS2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,May 16 2005, 12:53 PM
the material simply takes longer to smooth out and break-in properly. 5k probably isn't detrimental. honda recommends 7500. most on the forums say 10k.
If that were the case then shouldn't we be driving the cars easy until 7500 miles as well?
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 11:55 AM
  #16  
suprfunguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
From: Dunbar,PA
Default

After a few months of S2K ownership, my dealer sent a letter reminding me of the approaching "7500 mile service". Attached to the letter was a coupon for a "complimentary vehicle safety inspection" (NOT to be confused with STATE INSP...) and my favorite- "complimentary tire rotation".

I cannot begin to express the peace of mind I have knowing that my Honda dealer inspected my car for "safety" and that my tires have been properly "rotated".
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 12:10 PM
  #17  
mikegarrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by suprfunguy,May 16 2005, 12:55 PM
"complimentary tire rotation"
I usually just use my right foot to accomplish "tire rotation".
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 01:35 PM
  #18  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

Originally Posted by RyanS2000,May 16 2005, 01:26 PM
If that were the case then shouldn't we be driving the cars easy until 7500 miles as well?
no, that accomplishes something different mechanically. and even that is up for debate.
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #19  
RyanS2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,May 16 2005, 04:35 PM
no, that accomplishes something different mechanically. and even that is up for debate.
Well the car was 3 yrs old with only 4100 miles and I don't believe the oil had ever been changed on it. So I figured it needed to be done and I switched to Mobil1 10w-30 at 5000miles. Should I be too worried? Anything I should do now?
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 01:45 PM
  #20  
koala's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,731
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Originally Posted by RyanS2000,May 16 2005, 03:41 PM
Well the car was 3 yrs old with only 4100 miles and I don't believe the oil had ever been changed on it. So I figured it needed to be done and I switched to Mobil1 10w-30 at 5000miles. Should I be too worried? Anything I should do now?
I switched to Mobil 1 at 3,750 miles (approx). I've never burned any measureable amount of oil (and I was/am fully aware of Honda's recommendation of a 10k mile minimum before synthetic).

It's probably a bigger deal on the 00-03 cars, as they tend to have more of an oil consumption issue.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:46 PM.