http://world.honda.com/news/2006/4060925VTEC/

 

If anyone asks, tell them that your S2000 has SS-VTEC (Simple SH*T VTEC). Just a few rods, a solenoid, an extra set of cam followers; very little to break down. The disadvantage of SS-VTEC is that the transition is not smooth, as we all know. But that is half the fun to me: crossing 6000 rpm and hearing that sudden increase in sound and booting sensation in the butt. Wouldn't have it any other way. By contrast, the BMW 3 Series is absolutely seamless, but that Double VANOS is known for wearing out in higher mileage specimens. I shudder to think what repairs must cost.

 

I agree.. the best part IMO is knowing your in vtec and the feeling of it kicking in! Oh, and I know people with BMW's and the Vanos unit is always giving them problems! It either isn't working right or it works but makes loud noises while driving!

My car isn't an economy car.. its a sports car.
I'll take the SS-Vtec please

 

This is what people say about Pushrod motors. "They are simpler and less likely to break down than DOHC motors."

Now that something newer is out, you feel the need to defend the technology in your car.

 

[QUOTE=ruexp67,Sep 27 2006, 11:32 AM]

This is what people say about Pushrod motors.

 

My point exactly. There is always something better. faster. more technologically advanced on the horizon. It doesn't change what you HAVE.

 

Agreed. But, I don't think there is anything more 'technologically advanced' that will replace that babe in your avatar

 

in a few years expect some newbie to ask if they could swap the advanced vtec engine into their S.

 

But there could be something better. (Mabey not faster. )