S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Automatic Transmission in S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 12, 2016 | 08:00 AM
  #11  
afzan's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 103
From: Toronto
Default

Could've sold more s2000 if there was more seats, a hardtop, automatic and more luxury features.

But then it wouldn't be an s2000
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2016 | 09:52 AM
  #12  
GSteg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 893
Likes: 12
Default

Yes it would have sold more.

I wouldn't mind an S2000 with DCT or something of that nature. But since the S2000 was created in the 90s, we would have been offered a miserable 4 spd auto.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2016 | 12:15 PM
  #13  
Chuck S's Avatar
Member (Premium)
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 13,815
Likes: 1,543
From: Chesterfield VA
Default

The people who are supposed to buy two seat roadsters simply don't buy them. Most of our cars were previously owned by folks who bought them -- and then didn't want them any more.

The lessons have always been here to include 50 years ago!

Pretty sure the sales of the 1958 Thunderbird were exceeded those of 1955, 1956, and 1957 combined. Yep, hard top, automatic transmission, 4 seats... This was after the Tbird outsold the Corvette by a giant factor. Ford conceded the market to GM for some reason.

-- Chuck
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2016 | 12:37 PM
  #14  
Hidef1080's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by Soof
I was talking with a car salesman about my S2000 while my wife and I were shopping for a new Chevy.

His comment about the S2000 was that if Honda had provided an automatic transmission as an option Honda would have sold more cars.

What's your opinion?
It would have sold more cars but how many more is unknown.
There are more automatics on the road and more high dollar sport cars are going to the "manual/auto" as the only option.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2016 | 03:40 PM
  #15  
slalom44's Avatar
20 Year Member
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 95
From: Granville OH
Default

I don't think they could have fit a conventional automatic with a torque converter in the space allowed for the tranny. They would have had to make the tunnel larger, thus less room in the cabin. And auto trannies are heavier, changing the handling and dynamics of the car.

They would have had to make compromises, making it more like a Miata.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2016 | 04:54 PM
  #16  
Dead Serious's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 131
From: Race Track
Default

Honda doesnt have another front engine rwd car so just like the manual trans in our S2Ks it would have had to be developed and mfg just for the S2K. We would have seen a higher price point on all S2Ks because of this. Besides the rumor is Honda lost money on the S2K as it was. With a higher price they would have lost just as many sales as they would have picked up with the auto option. I think it was business savvy to only offer the manual. Not the other way around.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2016 | 09:03 PM
  #17  
Soof's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 679
Likes: 38
From: Spring Lake Hts, NJ
Default

I thought the salesman was a bit daft, but then again, how many really love cars? It's a job and I understand that.

I see that the new Porsche 911R is getting a six speed manual because of customer demand ! I guess that bodes well for us manual die hards !!!!
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2016 | 05:12 AM
  #18  
Chuck S's Avatar
Member (Premium)
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 13,815
Likes: 1,543
From: Chesterfield VA
Default

In reality it was probably the lack of business savvy to only offer the car with a manual gearbox. Certainly for the North American market where no one knows how to drive a stick shift. Even the rental cars in Europe and Japan are sticks.

I doubt Honda intended to make a profit on these cars either although the dealers did by charging a premium over MSRP when the cars were new. Automakers have "vanity" cars and the S2000 was certainly one. New NSX is one as well. Honda really doesn't care how many they sell.

-- Chuck
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2016 | 06:05 PM
  #19  
Car Analogy's Avatar
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,743
Likes: 1,850
Default

The Mitsubishi Eclipse. It started off as a decent performance car. In each model year they progressively became more and more mainstream. More lame.

It worked. It became the best selling 'sportscar' of all time, or something like that.

Sadly, selling out sells.

Sent from my SM-G920P using IB AutoGroup
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2016 | 06:09 PM
  #20  
darcyw's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,376
Likes: 443
From: um, a house
Default

HA, HA, HA.

The narrow seats, small cock pit, and zero torque still would have kept a majority of buyers away more than any automatic would have helped.

darcy
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:22 AM.