S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

best 0-60 mods?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 09:47 PM
  #1  
S2KHHI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Hilton Head Island, SC
Default best 0-60 mods?

I have heard many different things, VAFC, gears, obviously SC, I also know the S2K is not a drag car, but for people who want better 0-60 times, any recommendations? Experiences with lowering VTEC, etc? Thanks for all your input!
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 09:56 PM
  #2  
Silver9k's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 6
From: DFW, TX
Default

I'd say gears are your best bang for buck mod in acceleration...
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 09:59 PM
  #3  
yellafeva's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 0
From: Twilight Zone
Default

Gears or sticky tires. Right now, I have the stickiest tires of all, and
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 10:01 PM
  #4  
dispader's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 0
From: San Angelo, TX
Default

nitrous...
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 10:09 PM
  #5  
revhi's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 2
From: Used Jersey
Default

The S/C wont help 0 to 60.

Not sure if the gears will either because you will have to shift one extra time making you loose a split second there.

Alcohol powered Jet engine might help
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 04:17 AM
  #6  
natedoggs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville
Default

SlowS2K mentioned that lowering the VTEC crossover is not a good idea. You should ask him for reasons why.

You may want to get different gears if you want better 0-60 acceleration, but it will affect top speed and how many RPM's you turn at highway speeds.

Otherwise, get grippier tires and become a better driver (find the "perfect" launch).
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 05:40 AM
  #7  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

4.44 gears will allow you to reach 60.6 MPH in 2nd gear, so they would be the best option. Anything lower (numerically higher) will require an extra shift before 60 MPH.

Sticky / light weight tires and wheels coupled with a strong clutch and light weight flywheel would also provide a lot of bang. Keep in mind that you would also need a reinforced diff housing to make sure it didn't blow up.

Weight savings would also be extremely helpfull.

I don't think engine mods would really make as much of a difference as the items above.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 28, 2004 | 07:12 AM
  #8  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Strengthened half-shafts also. A Houston owner broke the ones on his S/C S2000 at the drag strip a couple years ago.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 01:17 PM
  #9  
jguerdat's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 1
From: Rochester, NY
Default

Camaro or Mustang... <smile>
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 01:44 PM
  #10  
dhayner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA
Default

Originally Posted by natedoggs2k,Jul 28 2004, 04:17 AM
SlowS2K mentioned that lowering the VTEC crossover is not a good idea. You should ask him for reasons why.
Our cars have two cam profiles. One is designed for good torque at low rpm, but torque falls off at higher rpm. The other is designed for good torque at high rpm, but doesn't develop much torque at lower rpm.

At some rpm, these profiles each produce the same torque, and that is where you want to switch from the low-rpm to the high-rpm profile. Assuming Honda has done it right, and I don't see why they would not have, that rpm is the standard VTEC engagement rpm.

In other words, the torque curves cross. If you switch to the high-rpm profile at a lower rpm than standard (on a stock engine), the high-rpm profile will actually produce less torque than the low-rpm profile you switched away from.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:09 AM.