S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

C&D-Collect ’Em All: Buying the 2001 10Best List

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-07-2011, 05:15 PM
  #1  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
closekd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default C&D-Collect ’Em All: Buying the 2001 10Best List

Ran across this article on car and driver.com. Did a search and didnt see that anyone posted it. The S2000 peice is about 2/3 of the way down the page above the Miata.

"One of Honda’s two forays into rear-wheel-drive cars in the past 20 years, the S2000 is one of those special cars that are canonized the moment they come into existence (it’s no coincidence that Honda’s other rear-driver, the Acura NSX, was another). A screaming 2.0-liter engine with an 8300-rpm redline drove the rear wheels through a perfect six-speed manual gearbox. The handling and the brakes were top-shelf, making the S2000 ideal as a track champ or canyon carver. In 2001, we even admonished buyers not to squander their S2K’s potential on mundane trips around town. Now we say why not use it for everything, every day? With the roof folded, there’s even limitless vertical cargo space. There’s only one spec to buy, but shoppers need to make sure the S2000 they’re looking at has been adult-driven and well maintained."

http://www.caranddriver.com/features/10q4/...st_list-feature

enjoy!
Old 02-07-2011, 07:47 PM
  #2  
Registered User

 
ahrmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hah. mistake. 2.0L with 9K, 2,2 with 8300~!

lolz, jk...
Old 02-08-2011, 04:18 AM
  #3  

 
fsunole1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Nice to see how it has held its value compared to the rest of the vehicles.
Old 02-08-2011, 05:36 AM
  #4  
Registered User

 
deepbluejh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Kinda surprising how fast the original boxter was compared to the S2000. It could spank it handily in a straight line - and with only 201hp.
Old 02-08-2011, 05:46 AM
  #5  

 
clarkster009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,663
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by deepbluejh,Feb 8 2011, 06:36 AM
Kinda surprising how fast the original boxter was compared to the S2000. It could spank it handily in a straight line - and with only 201hp.
No, that was the 250 hp Boxster S.
Old 02-08-2011, 05:47 AM
  #6  

 
clarkster009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,663
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I thought I remembered reading how before the S2000 came along the Boxster wasn't really all that impressive, but then once the S2000 started getting all the roadster accolades, then Porsche started putting more into it. So I am surprised the 2000-2001 Boxters are "excellent".
Old 02-08-2011, 06:14 AM
  #7  
Registered User

 
deepbluejh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by clarkster009,Feb 8 2011, 06:46 AM
No, that was the 250 hp Boxster S.
So that's still 1 full second quicker to 60mph... with only 10 more rated HP. Look at all that torque going to work for the Boxter.
Old 02-08-2011, 06:50 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
TougeS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tualatin, OR
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Actually enthusiests really like the boxer. It generally gets a shitty rap because its the lowest end porsche, but the reviews ive seen are great, amazing balance and wonderful brakes.
Old 02-08-2011, 07:56 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
eld4au6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any one else notice the prices are way low on there?

$4,000 for a E46 bmw?

Look at the prices of the replacement parts on the Accord
Old 02-08-2011, 08:18 AM
  #10  
Registered User

 
rob-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,657
Received 170 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by clarkster009,Feb 8 2011, 07:47 AM
I thought I remembered reading how before the S2000 came along the Boxster wasn't really all that impressive, but then once the S2000 started getting all the roadster accolades, then Porsche started putting more into it. So I am surprised the 2000-2001 Boxters are "excellent".
Top Gear said the same thing.

In 1999 it was the most powerful sports car in it's budget. It our powered porsche and bmw's equivalent in a 2.0L.

Until the Z4 came out with the 3.2v6 The 2009 S2000 still produced more HP.


Quick Reply: C&D-Collect ’Em All: Buying the 2001 10Best List



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 PM.