S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Common S2000 "myths" debunked....

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 02:02 PM
  #21  
AnthonyShafer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Hoboken, NJ
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bieg
[B]For those who insist on the "NO TORQUE" bull, get a clue;

Torque is directly related to displacement in a naturally aspirated engine.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 02:03 PM
  #22  
computer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by steve c
[B]I don't think those are really myths that can be debunked.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 04:03 PM
  #23  
Station's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 2
From: Elk Grove
Default

Thank you. Your words describe my feelings about the car exactly. Not once have I ever felt that my S is underpowered...even without cracking 6000 rpm. And I stand by my original statement....no V6 for this car!! And no higher displacement 4, either.

And I'm no longer afraid to turn the steering wheel in my S... I realize that it's capabilities far exceed any other car I've ever driven. It does inspire confidence. Someday I hope to take it to a performance driving school so that I may really learn where the car's limits are. I'm obviously staying well within them right now, but I'd still like to know where they are. That way I can find out just how crazy some of you really are.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 04:39 PM
  #24  
turbolane's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 1
From: Clearlake, CA
Default

Torque -- The S2000 has plenty, for everyday use. The only time I've ever wanted more is at the track; sure be nice not to loose the advantage I gained on a turbo-mustage in the turns once we get to a straightaway

Handling -- Any RWD vehicle with a performance suspension can be spun around fast. I've spun my 68RWHp Bertone twice, and nearly spun it three times. Every time was my fault due to driving hard on wet roads, and I'm lucky to have not crashed in one of the spins. (The other I recovered, out of luck, after the first 360). I've "lost" the rear twice in the S2000, each time because, at low speed, I reved to hard on slick/cold surfaces (but did not reach VTEC). Both were my fault.

As with every other vehicle on the road, the S2000 is not perfect and needs to be driven with this in mind
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2002 | 02:06 AM
  #25  
JT-KGY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Alhambra
Default

Originally posted by Utah S2K
The S2000 has an insanely low curb weight....this is why even with it's meek torque band it still blows the doors off most cars in 0-60. This high power to weight ratio is also what gives this car the fun factor in the twisties.......
Utah

I disagree that S2000 has "insanely low curb weight"... it could be lighter, IMO.
S2000 weighs ~2800lb.. while Boxster (non-S) is 10 in. longer 2in wider but weighs
2778lb with a 6-cylinder engine...
Other roadsters like Miata weighs ~2400lb.. and Toyota ~2200lb... both weigh alot
less than S2000 (though they are both smaller).
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2002 | 04:54 AM
  #26  
negcamber's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,821
Likes: 5
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally posted by lane
Handling -- Any RWD vehicle with a performance suspension can be spun around fast. I've spun my 68RWHp Bertone twice, and nearly spun it three times.
Well, any car can be spun, that is true. But some cars spin more readily than others and are more difficult to recover once a spin begins. And certainly the mid-engine Fiat Bertone is one that spins pretty easily and does is not easy to pull back once the rear starts coming around. But that is true of any mid-engine car. The S2k is one that I class with the 911SC as to how readily it will spin...up to 9/10ths and you are fine...cross the edge and you are on a tea-cup ride at Disney.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2002 | 05:30 AM
  #27  
airsport's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: The Armpit of Florida
Default

Torque? Na, its about 6k to 9k and horsepower!

I joined the S2K spin club Sunday. Cold tires and a 35mph 90 to the right. Went in a bit hot and stepped on it hard. Felt it give out and got off it. Skidded about 50 to 60 degrees off axis.

Just a bit of an eye opener. Ya have to keep the car balanced if you are going to push hard.

Reply
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 10:58 AM
  #28  
Bieg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
From: :spam:u
Default

Originally posted by cdelena


Why do I care? If I can get more power, equivalent gas mileage, and great reliability from a unit that weighs about the same why do I care what design strategy was employed? The S2000 is a fine piece of equipment but not a design study to be emulated by all. There are plenty of ways to build an entertaining automobile and Honda does not have the market cornered.
Show me another 240 HP engine that weighs in at less or even the same as the F20. That is the whole point of the exercise, using less to get more. All things being equal the engine with less displacement will weigh less because it is smaller.

What the American manufacturers have historically done is build large displacement engines that they can run understressed at low HP/Liter efficiency so they can use cheaper parts and materials and still maintain reliability. There is no art in that.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 12:02 PM
  #29  
CRussel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Madeira Park (Sunshine Coast)
Default

- No Torque? Get real! Certainly, it is lower than a big displacement V8. But if you know how to drive, know to actually use that beautiful transmission, it's really quite adequate. Yes, it's peaky -- what would you expect from a 2 liter engine that's tuned for maximum HP?

- Unsafe Handling? No, I'm sorry, learn how to drive. Please, before you hurt yourself and maybe others. I was raised on rear wheel drive cars and learned how to handle them at the limit. You're right, they don't fail by plowing ahead in a straight line -- thank goodness! If I'd wanted a plow, I'd have bought one. What I wanted, and what I got, is a sports car. Not a muscle car, not a mustang, not even a corvette -- but a real, "old fashioned", fun to drive sports car that rewards good drivers and good driving. If you don't know how to handle a rear wheel drive car at the limit, go buy some time on a skid pad. Or, if you live in snow country as I did back when I first got a car, take your S2000 out to an empty parking lot on a snowy day and you've got a nice, FREE, skid pad. Spin it. Recover. get to know how it feels just before it breaks loose. This car won't yell at you that it's going to break loose, but it certainly gives you more than ample warning, if you know how to listen.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 12:06 PM
  #30  
JT-KGY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Alhambra
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bieg
[B]

Show me another 240 HP engine that weighs in at less or even the same as the F20.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:40 PM.