S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Consumer Reports Acceleration numbers

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 05:28 PM
  #1  
Luft46's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
From: Hampton
Default Consumer Reports Acceleration numbers

I got these acceleration numbers off teh Consumer Reports website... comments?

Acceleration

0-30 mph, sec. 2.1
0-60 mph, sec. 5.6
Quarter mile, sec. 14.4
Quarter mile, mph 97
45-65 mph, sec. 4.3

I guess most of them don't sound bad, except maybe that last one?
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 05:38 PM
  #2  
Destiny2002's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 2
From: Transporter
Default

I'm suprised those nerds could drive the car that quickly.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 05:40 PM
  #3  
gregstevens's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,263
Likes: 1
From: On the lakefront...
Default

Those numbers sound about right...but the last one is most likely timed in top gear. That's how magazines do testing to provide what they think is relevant data. IMO, 45-65 is one of the coolest acceleration bands of the S2000...I don't know the times for it in *second* gear, which is what it should be done in to achieve the best times possible, but this time is most likely top gear acceleration.

Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 06:43 PM
  #4  
s22k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: pearland
Default

those numbers are much better than i expected from comsumer reports. i guess they dumped the clutch this time.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 07:14 PM
  #5  
KYS2000's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Bowling Green
Default

Something i noticed in the Best Motoring videos i downloaded from the forum was one of the japanese drivers got a 14.00 with a S2000 with 800+miles on it but were dumping at 7500+rpm.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 07:29 PM
  #6  
L300Boy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Edgewood
Default

Thats really shocking for CR ... you'd expect something like 6.5 or something, with a high unreliability rating

They do a great job at testing batteries, but not much else.

car connection recently wrote up a good article over their flawed testing and reliability survey techniques.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2002 | 05:12 AM
  #7  
E30M3's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Default

>>> I'm suprised those nerds could drive the car that quickly.<<<

I ran into a CR tester or tech guy at an AUTOCROSS in CT awhile back. That was a shock. He certainly had a clue about driving and wrenching and was a regular guy. He was running an old RX-7 which he was setting up for it's SCCA classification.

Stan
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2002 | 08:52 AM
  #8  
Destiny2002's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 2
From: Transporter
Default

I take that all back then. I pictured the CR driver being the same guy who smells armpits to test deodorant. Sorry!
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2002 | 09:35 AM
  #9  
Speed 2000's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock
Default

The Annual Consumer Car Guide also lists the S2000 as far and away the most reliable roadster with the Miata finishing second. The 2 worst were the Corvette and Boxster, both in the negative range as far as the Honda was in the positive range!
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2002 | 09:48 AM
  #10  
CG's Avatar
CG
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,029
Likes: 2
From: In the heart of the USSA!
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Speed 2000
[B]The Annual Consumer Car Guide also lists the S2000 as far and away the most reliable roadster with the Miata finishing second.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 PM.