S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Crappy Review

Thread Tools
 
Old May 14, 2001 | 12:16 PM
  #1  
mjcohen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
From: Menlo Park, CA 4ever a
Default

What is with this review?????

http://www.classifieds2000.com/cgi-cls/dis...aS2000_roadtest
Reply
Old May 14, 2001 | 12:22 PM
  #2  
mrkim019's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,136
Likes: 0
From: Saratoga
Default

this guy must die.....

what an a** this guy must be. I bet he's 40+year and still lives with his mom.
Reply
Old May 14, 2001 | 12:24 PM
  #3  
jahwerx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: Long Valley
Default

Yeah, a Z3 2.5 as an alternative. . . Great suspension

They did like the brakes though. Maybe they should have released the emergency brake for the 0-60 test.
Reply
Old May 14, 2001 | 12:31 PM
  #4  
S2KRoadster.com's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Des Plaines (Chicago)
Default

His writting style says it all...

He is as slopy as his writting...

I beleive the S2000 is for very selective owners...if that was not the case then Honda would not hand-manufacture them next to the NSX and also mass produce them like anything...

Its like that saying...there is one in every crowd...

FK
Reply
Old May 14, 2001 | 12:32 PM
  #5  
smccurry's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,562
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Default

The S2000 was obviously not built with this guy in mind. THANK GOODNESS!!
Reply
Old May 14, 2001 | 12:41 PM
  #6  
lvs2k's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,959
Likes: 0
From: Bedford
Default

Like most things, one man's meat is another man's mess. The very few shortcomings of the S are are more than out-weighed by the good IMHO. Many reviewers have found fault with the Stook, somehow expecting a boulevard ride on a stiffly sprung, good-handling roadster. That's why they find cars like the Audi TT roadster so appealing as a cruiser, if not a handler. Granted, the S is somewhat inferior to the comfortable, fine handling Boxster S, but it's also less than half the cost, given similar equipment and ameneties.

I question the credentials of some of the reviewers of the Honda. They seem to have no concept regarding what a performance automobile is all about. I love my Stook; slings and arrows flung at it trouble me not!
Reply
Old May 14, 2001 | 01:01 PM
  #7  
S2.001K's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Bethesda
Default

I didn't find this review too off the mark. Am I missing something here? You have to consider this guy's audience? Many, if not most people, will not appreciate the characteristics of this car. Even many of the people here on this board will never push the car to its limits(in a controlled environment of course ) and drive it to its designed thresholds. His points were honest and his conclusions speak to the soccer moms and weekend blvd cruisers. Good advice for them to keep away, I think. It is a performance car that fills a small niche market.
Reply
Old May 14, 2001 | 01:13 PM
  #8  
SilverFog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: British Columbia
Default

Originally posted by S2.001K
I didn't find this review too off the mark. Am I missing something here? You have to consider this guy's audience? Many, if not most people, will not appreciate the characteristics of this car. Even many of the people here on this board will never push the car to its limits(in a controlled environment of course ) and drive it to its designed thresholds. His points were honest and his conclusions speak to the soccer moms and weekend blvd cruisers. Good advice for them to keep away, I think. It is a performance car that fills a small niche market.
Yes, unfortunate that the review was playing to a more genteel audience, but with that in mind, not too far off the mark.

Doesn't concern me since most respected reviews are able to compensate for that in their writing and completely gloss over the raw performance of the car, but warn away those who need not apply at the same time.

Honda itself has said that its not a car for everyone.
Reply
Old May 14, 2001 | 05:58 PM
  #9  
2x6spds's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
From: newport beach
Default

Sounds like he launched off idle for those times, the only thing I'd take issue with is when he says, "Even small bumps can jolt occupants and make the body shudder." I've never felt any flex in the structure at all. Wonder what was wrong with the test car.

2x6spds
Reply
Old May 14, 2001 | 06:00 PM
  #10  
S2K Fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,898
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
Default

I read a lot of negative reviews when I first bought it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:54 PM.